[Insight-developers] Valgrind defects: so close

[Bill Lorensen]

Warnings are next...

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Bradley Lowekamp
<blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>
> *stands up and applauds*
>
> While Luis earlier suggested that the New Year's resolution was to bring the
> Valgrind errors down to zero, I think the better one is to keep it there!
> So everyone, don't forget to check for Valgrind on the morning after you
> have committed code along with the standard failing tests, and compilation
> issues.
> Great work everyone!
> Brad
> On Dec 29, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Bill Lorensen wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Valgrinds defects have almost disappeared.
> 4 here: http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewDynamicAnalysis.php?buildid=812506
> and
> 1 here: http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewDynamicAnalysis.php?buildid=812641
>
> Here's a rundown:
>
> 1) PrintSelf-Review - 1 defect
>    Needs a suppression for the tcl defect
> 2) itkBSplineDeformableTransformTest - 1 defect
>     Just introduced today. Quick resolution anticipated
> 3) itkIOPluginTest and itkObjectFactoryTest2 - 2 defects
>     A bit more complicated. I described the issues in an e-mail with subject
>      Valgrind Leak Dilemma: ObjectFactoryBase
>
> BTW, I don't recall ever having 0 valgrind defects in ITK.
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>