[Insight-developers] N4 in ITK

[Nicholas Tustison]

Thanks, Hans.  Sounds good to me.  The application was never meant to go into ITK anyway.  It's something that we put together strictly for our Penn pipeline and I just thought it would be more useful to the average article reader than a simple test. 

Anyway, for now I'll just update the IJ article with Richard's suggestions and perhaps Luis can weigh in when he's available. 

Nick

On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Hans Johnson wrote:

> Nick,
> 
> I'd support putting the general ITK process objects that have wider usage
> into ITK, and putting the application that is used into Slicer3.  Let the
> ITK community maintain the core algorithmic pieces, and the Slicer community
> maintain the end user application interfaces.
> 
> Hans
> 
> -- 
> Hans J. Johnson, Ph.D.
> Hans-johnson at uiowa.edu
> 
> 278 GH
> The University of Iowa
> Iowa City, IA 52241
> (319) 353 8587
> 
> 
>> From: Nicholas Tustison <ntustison at gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:40:06 -0500
>> To: Kent Williams <norman-k-williams at uiowa.edu>
>> Cc: ITK <insight-developers at itk.org>, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] N4 in ITK
>> 
>> Hi Kent,
>> 
>> That's what I had figured that you all were heavy users/testers like we are at
>> Penn.  In addition, Andriy interfaces with the slicer community regarding N4.
>> And as far as I know, nobody has ran into any issues until recently when
>> Richard had problems with his set up.  What would be nice (and I say this
>> because I'm completely lazy) is to simply pass ownership to the ITK community
>> where these issues would be better addressed via the Dashboard versus me
>> making changes to N4 through the IJ and hoping that I don't break anybody
>> else's set-up with the changes.
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:20 AM, kent williams wrote:
>> 
>>> We try and keep in sync in the BRAINS3 project and have a regular dashboard
>>> build. We also have several tests we run.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/7/10 8:13 AM, "Nicholas Tustison" <ntustison at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>> 
>>>> Richard Beare ran into a couple issues running N4 recently on a couple of
>>>> his
>>>> systems which I hadn't encountered.  He worked out a solution which I plan
>>>> to
>>>> propagate back to the IJ as a revision soon.  However, considering the
>>>> number
>>>> of people that actually use the code and the fact that addressing these
>>>> issues
>>>> would be better done in a versioning/review system where I can actually see
>>>> the results from these subtle code changes on different systems on the
>>>> dashboard, is there a mechanism that would allow for inclusion of new code
>>>> into itkv4 even amidst all the *chaos that is the current itkv4 development
>>>> process?  However, I certainly don't want to seem like I'm trying to force
>>>> in
>>>> my own code into the repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Nick
>>>> 
>>>> *(I use the term "chaos" only for rhetorical effect and I actually
>>>> appreciate
>>>> all the work that's been done to make it as smooth as it has been.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>> 
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>> 
>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>> 
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>> 
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> 
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>