[Insight-developers] JPEG2000ImageIO moved to Review : Input images too large...

Luis Ibanez luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Mon Aug 23 17:17:25 EDT 2010


Hi Brad,

Thanks for giving it a try.

I haven't seen the Experimental build from "victoria"
in the Dashboard yet.

Should I apply the patch anyways  ?


   Please advise,


        Thanks


              Luis



--------------------------------
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am experiencing compilation in the openjpeg2000 library with regards to
> sse intrinsics:
> (my workstation victoria should be finishing the erroneous experimental
> build soon, so just check the cdash )
>
> I have published changes onto my github account in the "openjpeg2000_sse"
> branch. I have also attached a patch which can be applied with the "git am"
> command.
>
> Using SSE intrinsic portably is tricky. And it's tricky to test because
> it's not always clear which compilers have them enabled on the dashboard.
> But briefly reading the Intel, GCC, and MSDN documentation I believe the
> intrinsic functions are more portable then the overloaded operators.
>
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kishore,
>
> Now that we have updated openjpeg  to Monday's
> version of openjpeg-v2, we were also able to move
> the JPEG2000ImageIO classes from the
> Insight Journal paper:
>
> http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/741
> http://hdl.handle.net/10380/3187
>
>
> BTW: Thanks for submitting the paper     :-)
>
>
> We are however, struggling with the input images,
> since they are rather large.
>
> So far we have committed only the images
>
>
>    - Bretagne1.j2k ---- 90Kb
>    - Cevennes2.jp2 ---- 18Kb
>
>
> The others are larger than 100Kb....
>
>
> The conundrum is that, we actually should test
> with very large images, given that this is one
> of the purposes of introducing JPEG2000.
>
>
> Any ideas are welcome....
>
> In the meantime, if you have a chance, please
> give it a try at the new code in ITK/Code/Review.
>
>
>    Thanks
>
>
>         Luis
>
>
> <ATT00001..txt>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100823/7af229eb/attachment.htm>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list