[Insight-developers] Tagging ITKv4-Alpha-01 : Moving to next phase

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Brad,


1) So, should we tag despite the compilation errors
    in Visual Studio 7.1 and the Sun compiler ?



2) Regarding the update of the TIFF library,
    I would propose that we go for   3.8.2:

    This seems to be the most recent
    release of libtiff:

          http://dl.maptools.org/dl/libtiff/

    Apparently it was released on Mar 23 2006...

    I have yet to verify it this one will manage
    images larger than 2Gbs.



              Luis


------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>wrote:

> Luis,
>
> These are small issues which I don't believe overlap with the upgrades to
> the utilities. I don't believe this should hold up people starting to work
> on the next phase, just delay their commit until they can rebase or what not
> onto this tag.
>
> Also which tiff library are we upgrading too? Is it the one that includes
> large tiff support?
>
> Brad
>
> On Aug 12, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
>
> Hi Brad,
>
> Let's review these issues tomorrow after the tcons.
>
> It will be nice to be able to tag ITKv4-Alpha-01
> so we can move into updating the third party
> libraries (TIFF, openjpeg...)
>
>
>    Luis
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> After my large commits yesterday I see a couple small items I may be
>> responsible for:
>>
>> 1)  Failing Test on one Sun system:
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=691606
>>
>> It appears to be the results of this change:
>>
>> http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=commitdiff;h=9e3c91c911371b99bc77d518e0b19ccd2732e511
>>
>> and it is segment faulting on print a long double type. This does not make
>> since to me, as the other build on this system seem to be working fine.
>>
>> 2) Some windows builds are having issue with "::ptrdiff_t" in
>> itkIntTypes.h
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=691678
>>
>> What is interesting is that the second continuous build yesterday from
>> this system was able to build fine the second time! This leads me to believe
>> that it is an issue with the cmake files, and get ITK_STDDEF_H correct.
>>
>>
>> http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=blob;f=Code/Common/itkIntTypes.h;h=2f4dc4d78791b68c7e5c21dc9bd1f6f29184f1ec;hb=HEAD
>>
>> If I could see the "itkConfigure.h" generated on one of these systems, it
>> would be helpful for verifying this hypothesis. As on my system it appears
>> to be set correctly and can't repoduce the problem, and the CMakeLists.txt
>> looks ok to me.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> ========================================================
>> Bradley Lowekamp
>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>> National Library of Medicine
>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100813/23256ba5/attachment.htm>