[Insight-developers] Renames in ITK history :)

[Bill Lorensen]

But with
git mv old

do I need to add/commit each file in the directory, or just
git commit new

Seems logical to me...

Bill


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:30 PM, David Cole <david.cole at kitware.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I may have other changes I am not ready to commit. So what specific
>> commit do I use just for these chamnges.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Matthew McCormick (thewtex)
>> <matt at mmmccormick.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Let's say old is a directory.
>> >> I do
>> >> git mv old new
>> >>
>> >> How to I commit? Do I just do
>> >> git commit new
>> >>
>> >
>> > Just
>> >   git commit
>> > works.
>> >
>> > I like to do 'git commit -a'  whenever possible because it will catch
>> > any
>> > files I forgot to do 'git rm' on.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
> As with any git commit, you first do:
>
> git add file1
> git add file2
> git add ...
>
> Then do the git commit and it will only commit the files you've added.
>
> I always do "git status" a lot to see what git thinks I've done in between
> all the other git commands. One thing I like about git: when you do a git
> status, it gives you helpful hints about how to add new files, or how to get
> a file back to its state from the repo.
>
>
> HTH,
> David
>
>