[Insight-developers] wrapitk unstable in itk dashboard

[Gaëtan Lehmann]

It seems to be that one... but with the wrong name :-(
I have BUILDNAME set as it should in my build:

   [glehmann at marvin build]$ grep BUILDNAME CMakeCache.txt
   BUILDNAME:STRING=Head-WrapITK
   //Advanced flag for variable: BUILDNAME
   BUILDNAME-ADVANCED:INTERNAL=1
   //Modified flag for variable: BUILDNAME
   BUILDNAME-MODIFIED:INTERNAL=1

Is there something special to do to use that variable as the buildname  
in ctest?

Thanks,

Gaëtan



Le 21 mai 09 à 23:20, Luis Ibanez a écrit :

> Hi Gaetan,
>
> The build that I see is called
>
> Linux-wrapitk
>
> from
>
> marvin.jouy.inra.fr
>
> Is that the one that you are referring to ?
>
> Please let me know,
>
> and I will move it to the NightlyExternals group
> and marked as Expected build.
>
>
>      Thanks
>
>
>            Luis
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 2009/5/21 Gaëtan Lehmann <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> I've submitted a first build with the name "Head-WrapITK", as you  
> suggested. The build host is marvin.jouy.inra.fr.
>
>  Can you try to put it on the dashboard?
>
> To make the build a bit faster, I've kept only the dimension 2.  
> Because of that, there should be some unwanted warnings in the build  
> - I'll adjust the build options in the next days.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gaëtan
>
>
>
> Le 17 mai 09 à 23:26, Luis Ibanez a écrit :
>
>
> Hi Gaetan,
>
>
>
>           This is a great idea.
>
>
>
> It will really fit in the ITK Dashboard.
>
>
> One easy way to start is to simply choose a BUILDNAME
> that is very specific and descriptive. For example
> "Head-WrapITK".
>
> Submit your builds Nightlies, and then we will move
> them to the "Nightly Externals" group in CDash.
>
>
>  Let us know as soon as you have submitted a Nightly
>  of these, and we will take of the CDash group.
>
>
>    Thanks
>
>
>
>        Luis
>
>
> ------------------------
> Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
> Luis, Bill,
> I'd like to submit the wrapitk unstable tests results to the ITK   
> dashboard, like what was done for the statistics refactoring.
> Wrapitk shows more problems in ITK than the stable one - for  
> example  the problems in the documentation.
> Would it be possible? Can you give me some pointers on how to do that?
> Thanks,
> Gaëtan
>
> -- 
> Gaëtan Lehmann
> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.mandriva.org
> http://www.itk.org  http://www.clavier-dvorak.org
>
>

-- 
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.mandriva.org
http://www.itk.org  http://www.clavier-dvorak.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20090521/cf44611c/attachment.pgp>