[Insight-developers] fixing a few remaining failing tests relating to pixel-centered coordinates
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Thu May 21 12:36:21 EDT 2009
Wes,
Yes, it does fit.
We will insert the warning message, and we can refine the
exact wording once we reach a concensus.
Luis
----------------
Wes Turner wrote:
> I think a warning makes sense until we have better validation.
>
> Michel/Luis is this something that fits in with what you are doing?
>
> - Wes
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com
> <mailto:bill.lorensen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> My point is that we have not validated the new code as far as I can
> tell.
>
> Bill
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Simon Warfield
> <simon.warfield at childrens.harvard.edu
> <mailto:simon.warfield at childrens.harvard.edu>> wrote:
> > Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, I think that will be OK. We should add an Attention: warning to
> >> the CMakeLists.txt file. Something like:
> >>
> >> SET(msg "Attention: You have chosen to enable the use of
> >> cell-centered coordinates.")
> >>
> >
> > The tool kit currently uses a mixture of both, so the above is a bit
> > misleading. How about instead:
> > SET(msg "Attention: You have chosen to enable the consistent use
> of centered
> > pixel coordinates.")
> >
> > We should explain the pros and cons of the choice e.g.:
> >>
> >> SET(msg "${msg} This new functionality has not been fully
> validated.
> >> USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.")
> >>
> >
> > SET(msg "${msg} The old functionality creates an inconsistent
> physical
> > coordinate system.")
> >>
> >> SET(msg "${msg} With this ON, you can expect to see differences in
> >> registration and interpolation results.")
> >>
> >
> > differences -> improvements
> >>
> >> # display the message during the setup
> >> MESSAGE("${msg}")
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Simon
> >>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list