[Insight-developers] Image memory model

[Julien Jomier]

Hello,

The Insight Journal used to have SVN access, we are in the process of 
re-enabling it. That said the current system only allow to "play" with 
temporary dashboard and make sure it compiles, then the user is 
responsible for packaging the new revision.

I like the idea of having a central IJ SVN repository that we can test 
on a regular basis with the current ITK Head. This would definitely help 
   migrating code from the IJ to the Review directory. We should discuss 
how this should be done.

Julien

Stephen Aylward wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Great idea!
> 
> The IJ does have an associated SVN (cvs?) system, but perhaps it isn't 
> well documented / supported / integrated. 
> 
> Julien - any suggestions / ideas on how this can be done?
> 
> Stephen
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com 
> <mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com>> wrote:
> 
>     The Insight Jounal is not the most convenient revision control
>     system for code. If you make a fix to Dan's code, you will
>     have to package the source code again in a .zip file and
>     upload it to the IJ server. That's a very inconvenient way
>     of managing source code modifications.
> 
> 
>     It is common practice for us, that when we are about to move
>     an Insight Journal contribution from the Insight Journal into
>     the Code Review directory, we contact the authors and ask for
>     the most recent version.
> 
> 
>     One way to avoid this would be to have a Insight Journal
>     Sandbox SVN repository, where all ITK developers as well
>     as the paper author can have write access.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        Luis
> 
> 
> 
>     ---------------------
>     Stephen Aylward wrote:
> 
>         If this is being discussed on the Insight-Developers' mailing list,
>         and if this is generally useful to the community,
>         then shouldn't this go into the Insight Journal as an avenue for
>         moving into ITK proper?
> 
>         Basically, I disagree with the statement
>         "keep the code updated in the NAMIC sandbox. It makes a lot
>         easier for everybody to access the code"
> 
>         If there is a shortcoming in the InsightJournal, then it should
>         be addressed rather than sending the Insight community to other
>         sites.
> 
>         Stephen
> 
>         On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Dan Mueller <dan.muel at gmail.com
>         <mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com> <mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com
>         <mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> 
>            Hi Luis,
> 
>            My NAMIC username/password no longer seems to be valid (or I have
>            forgotten the details). Who do I contact to reset this?
> 
>            Regards, Dan
> 
>            2009/7/5 Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com
>         <mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>            <mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com
>         <mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com>>>:
> 
>             >
>             > Hi Dan,
>             >
>             > I would suggest to keep the code updated in the NAMIC sandbox.
>             > It makes a lot easier for everybody to access the code and
>             > commit improvements.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > BTW: This memory model is a great contribution to ITK.
>             >     We should keep it in the list of features for ITK 4.0.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >   Luis
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > -------------------
>             > Dan Mueller wrote:
>             >>
>             >> Hi all,
>             >>
>             >> Wow, time flies when your having fun. I started this email
>            thread over
>             >> one year ago, but only now got to finishing everything off.
>             >>
>             >> I have just submitted an article to the Insight Journal
>         with my
>            first
>             >> attempt at implementing some alternative memory models.
>         The URL
>            is not
>             >> yet active, but once the submission is approved, it
>         should live
>            here:
>             >>     http://hdl.handle.net/1926/3068
>             >>
>             >> Question: should I update the NAMIC sandbox with my
>            implementation, or
>             >> just keep everything in the journal?
>             >>
>             >> Cheers, Dan
>            _______________________________________________
>            Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>         <http://www.kitware.com>
> 
> 
>            Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>            http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
>            Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>            http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
>            Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>            http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         -- 
>         Stephen R. Aylward, Ph.D.
>         Director of Medical Imaging
>         Kitware, Inc. - North Carolina Office
>         http://www.kitware.com
>         (518) 371-3971 x300 (NY Line)
>         (919) 969-6990 x300 (NC Line)
>         stephen.aylward (Skype)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stephen R. Aylward, Ph.D.
> Director of Medical Imaging
> Kitware, Inc. - North Carolina Office
> http://www.kitware.com
> (518) 371-3971 x300 (NY Line)
> (919) 969-6990 x300 (NC Line)
> stephen.aylward (Skype)