[Insight-developers] itkTimeStamp Test Failures Mistery

[Luis Ibanez]

Brad

That modification sounds reasonable to me.

Unless somebody can come up with a typical use that actually
require TimeStamp::Modified() to be thread-safe...


    Luis


--------------------------
Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
> 
> So should we change the test so that each thread has it own itkTimeStamp 
> class. There by just testing that the class is reentrant. And then 
> specify in the TimeStamp documentation class that it is only re-entrant. 
> 
> I think that the test should then pass.  And it'll test the needed 
> functionality. Anyone object?
> 
> Brad
>  
>