[Insight-developers] Insight Journal paper "A Label Geometry Image Filter for Multiple Object Measurement" moved to Review
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Mon Dec 14 17:40:10 EST 2009
Ok, Ok,
I will admit it:
"Yes, the Borland compiler is useful" :-)
Luis
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> And don't forget to thank Mr. Borland...
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>> Thanks for fixing that !
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Also, if there was no intensity image provided, there was a floating
>>> point divide by zero in the computation of the Weighted Centroid.
>>> Although the results (nan) were visible in the test output, only the
>>> Borland compiler was kind enough to report a numerical error.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Guys,
>>>>
>>>> I have a solution for the VS6 compile problem. I'm trying it on my
>>>> Borland and VS7 systems.
>>>>
>>>> It does not resolve Luis' design questions, but it seems like a
>>>> portable solution for the existing code. If all of my builds are
>>>> successful, I'll check it in tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>> Dirk, Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's Dashboard is showing the usual quirks with
>>>>> the Sun and Visual studio 6.0 compilers.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue with VS6.0 requires some discussion:
>>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=489238
>>>>>
>>>>> Lines: 496-501
>>>>> declare a templated method inside a templated class,
>>>>> but the type of the template is not part of the arguments
>>>>> in the method signature:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> template<class TLabelImage, class TIntensityImage>
>>>>> template<class TGenericImage>
>>>>> bool
>>>>> LabelGeometryImageFilter<TLabelImage, TIntensityImage>
>>>>> ::CalculateOrientedImage(vnl_symmetric_eigensystem<double> eig,
>>>>> LabelGeometry & labelGeometry, bool useLabelImage)
>>>>> {
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Our typical solution to this problem is to make the template
>>>>> argument type to be one of the arguments of the function or
>>>>> method.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However, the overall design of this method is strange, since
>>>>> in addition to the template argument, it also includes a boolean
>>>>> that will switch the method from one behavior to another.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now... I am probably missing something here...
>>>>> but at first sight,
>>>>> having to rotate (by resampling) an image in order to
>>>>> compute the rotated bounding box, sounds like a very
>>>>> inefficient (and unnecessary) way of arriving to such
>>>>> computation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please elaborate on the rationale for
>>>>> performing this computation via this route ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We certainly would like to take care of this
>>>>> compilation error in VS6.0 today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Dirk, Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In preparation for the ITK 3.18 release,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your paper:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A Label Geometry Image Filter for Multiple Object Measurement"
>>>>>> http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/301
>>>>>> http://hdl.handle.net/1926/1493
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> has been moved into the directory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Insight/Code/Review
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A) Many coding style changes were made to the
>>>>>> source code in the Insight Journal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B) Only the 2D test has been incorporated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The image provided in the IJ paper for
>>>>>> the 3D test is a bit too large for ITK standards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you suggest a smaller image to use ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ideally one that is already in Testing/Data/Input :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> C) The Code Review is not yet complete,
>>>>>> we are still going through the list of items
>>>>>> in the Check List
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Code_Review_Check_List
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the meantime, we anticipate the usual tweaking
>>>>>> with different platforms (Borland, Cygwin, Sun CC...).
>>>>>> We will take care of it in the following days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Luis
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>
>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list