[Insight-developers] Nonportable Code
Gaëtan Lehmann
gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Sat Aug 15 04:19:01 EDT 2009
Le 15 août 09 à 05:30, Bill Lorensen a écrit :
> vxl_int_64 must be void on some platforms.
>
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=402232
>
> I repeat my concerns about such fundamental changes so close to a
> release.
I have commented the changes and filed bug reports to keep a track.
http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=9427
http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=9426
We are back to the previous situation.
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Code/Common/itkImageBase.txx?root=Insight&r1=1.56&r2=1.60
Gaëtan
>
> Bill
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Tom Vercauteren<tom.vercauteren at m4x.org
> > wrote:
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> Yes c++0x will have cstdint. It is already in boost.
>>
>> In the meantime we might want to rely on pstdint.h (a portable
>> stdint):
>> http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/pstdint.h
>>
>> See wikipedia for more information
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stdint.h
>>
>> But it looks like a large change to do right before the release.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 19:21, Sean McBride<sean at rogue-
>> research.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/14/09 6:56 PM, Gaëtan Lehmann said:
>>>
>>>> I've used that option, but I'm quite sure the types defined there
>>>> are
>>>> wrong.
>>>> For example,
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef _WIN32
>>>> typedef long ITK_INT64;
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef _WIN32
>>>> typedef unsigned long ITK_UINT64;
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> don't like right to me.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> Tom's way - vxl_int_64 - seems to be a better option.
>>>>
>>>> Should we fix the content of itkIntType.h by using vxl_int_64
>>>> types?
>>>> And do we even need itkIntType.h?
>>>
>>> This whole issue of fixed size types was solved and standardised
>>> with
>>> C99 (ISO/IEC 9899:1999), see:
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stdint.h>
>>>
>>> I know ITK is C++, not C. Anyone know if the next C++ standard C+
>>> +-0x
>>> will incorporate those types from C99?
>>>
>>> If so, seems to me we should use int32_t instead of creating an
>>> INT_INT32. (I know some compilers do not have stdint.h, but we can
>>> create compatible typedefs in those cases.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> Sean McBride, B. Eng sean at rogue-research.com
>>> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
>>> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
--
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20090815/09c03197/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list