[Insight-developers] Integrating the New Statistics framework into ITK

[Bradley Lowekamp]

How is directory renaming going to be implemented with CVS? Are we  
going to loose the version history of the old statistics?


On Apr 9, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Karthik Krishnan wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Bill Lorensen  
> <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> My thought was that we would compile both.
>
> We cannot compile both unless we change the filenames of the classes  
> in the refactored framework, to ones different from the ones in the  
> older framework.
>
> ITK distributed classes
> would be converted over to the StatisticsV2 (as long as the API
> remains the same).
>
> If we go with Option A, I think we should keep the current name for
> the old Statistics and call the new Statistics StatisticsV2 or some
> thing similar. We could still use the CMAKE selection mechanism.
>
> That sounds great.
>
> Would yout think that to a new user, it would be nice if he saw a  
> directory name was self-explanatorily named deprecated ? Also at  
> some point, if we moved to ITK-X.0 and broke compatibility, we could  
> drop the old directory, but we'd be stuck with a funky name  
> StatisticsV2.
>
> Thanks
> --
> karthik
>
> <ATT00001.txt>

========================================================
Bradley Lowekamp
Lockheed Martin Contractor for
Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
National Library of Medicine
blowekamp at mail.nih.gov


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20090409/54cc8d40/attachment.htm>