[Insight-developers] Integrating the New Statistics framework into ITK

[Bill Lorensen]

I don't see us dropping any directories that we have already
distributed to our customer.

Customers that have figured out how to use the current Statistics
would be surprised after an upgrade to see that their code no longer
compiles.

Changing filenames places zero burden on our customers, only an
inconvenience to us, the developers.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Karthik Krishnan
<karthik.krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> My thought was that we would compile both.
>
> We cannot compile both unless we change the filenames of the classes in the
> refactored framework, to ones different from the ones in the older
> framework.
>
>>
>> ITK distributed classes
>> would be converted over to the StatisticsV2 (as long as the API
>> remains the same).
>>
>> If we go with Option A, I think we should keep the current name for
>> the old Statistics and call the new Statistics StatisticsV2 or some
>> thing similar. We could still use the CMAKE selection mechanism.
>
> That sounds great.
>
> Would yout think that to a new user, it would be nice if he saw a directory
> name was self-explanatorily named deprecated ? Also at some point, if we
> moved to ITK-X.0 and broke compatibility, we could drop the old directory,
> but we'd be stuck with a funky name StatisticsV2.
>
> Thanks
> --
> karthik
>