[Insight-developers] ITK 3.10 : Release Preparation : Dashboard Status
Luis Ibanez
luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Mon Nov 3 20:12:35 EST 2008
Hi Arnaud,
Thanks for letting us know.
That is one thing less to worry about.
Regards,
Luis
---------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Arnaud Gelas
<arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I was running tests on gelas.megason.lab for several days using all core
> :-/...
> These tests are now over, and I have just ran itkTimeStampTest again (
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=208298), and
> there is actually no problem on this machine for this test.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience,
> Arnaud
>
> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>
>> ITK 3.10 Release Status
>> =======================
>>
>>
>> Here is a summary of the remaining Dashboard issues:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1) gelas.megason.lab: TimeStampTest failed with a Time out:
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207544
>> May it look like a threading-related problem...?
>> (this is the only machine where the test fails (today)).
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkTimeStampTest&date=2008-11-02
>> and the tests was passing before in this machine:
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11800122&build=207544
>> This is a 64bits machine.
>>
>>
>> 2) dash21.kitware : Disk Full
>> Not really an ITK problem.
>>
>>
>> 3) crl.med.hardvard.edu 64bits ICC 10 Debug
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207498
>> This seems to be a valid warning.
>> A virtual function shadowing another one in the base class.
>> Any objections about fixing this one ?
>>
>>
>> 4) crl.med.hardvard.edu 64bits ICC 10 Release
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207534
>> same as (3)
>>
>>
>> 5) RogueResearch3 : Mac10.5-InsightReview-gcc-dbg-ppc
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207495
>> Same as (3,4)
>>
>>
>> 6) Dash14.kitware : Win32-cygwin344
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207702
>> ResampleImageFilter9Test : Failed
>> This is the only machine where the test is failing today:
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=ResampleImageFilter9Test&date=2008-11-02
>> The test started failing in this machine between Oct 17 and 18th:
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11823849&build=207702
>>
>>
>>
>> 7) dash13.kitware: Win32-vs60
>> DeformableRegistration tests are failing (throwing Exceptions):
>>
>> DeformableRegistration12Test1
>> DeformableRegistration12Test2
>> DeformableRegistration12Test3
>> DeformableRegistration12Test4
>> DeformableRegistration13Test1
>> DeformableRegistration13Test2
>> DeformableRegistration13Test3
>> DeformableRegistration13Test4
>>
>> This is the only machine where these tests are failing today:
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=DeformableRegistration12Test1&date=2008-11-02
>>
>> and the
>> itkTimeProbesTest (also throwing an Exception):
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11523633&build=207694
>>
>>
>> 8) BillsLaptop: Win32-bcc5.5-Static
>> MRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest: Failed
>> This is the only machine where the test fails:
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkMRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest&date=2008-11-02
>> It seems to be a numerical issue:
>> "Absolute Avg. error with input and output mask = 33.6037"
>> "ERROR: sumOfError: 68171 is less than sumOfErrorFinal: 453650"
>>
>> In redwall.kitware (for example) this test passes with
>> the following equivalent output:
>> "Absolute Avg. error with input and output mask = 0.973767"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207427
>>
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Suggested action items:
>>
>> From the list above, the problems that seem to be worth addressing
>> before the relase are:
>>
>>
>> A) itkImageToVectorImageFilter::SetNthInput() method issue.
>>
>> B) ResampleImageFilter9Test failure in cygwin.
>> (we need another cygwin build to compare against..)
>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>> Comments and suggestions are welcome
>>
>>
>> Luis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Insight-developers mailing list
>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20081103/07a63ca4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list