[Insight-developers] ITK 3.10 : Release Preparation : Dashboard Status
Bill Lorensen
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 17:29:17 EST 2008
My only concern is that the API of ResourceProbesCollectorBase may
change to fix this problem. I think the same approach taken in
MetaDataDictionary is needed. I would help, but I won't be back home
until Thursday.
We can probably take the risk about changing the API in this case. It
is probably unlikely someone will use it in the next couple of weeks.
I agree we should tag.
Bill
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I'm trying to track the problem with the Deformable registration tests
> in VS60. The class that seems to be involved with a std::map in these
> tests is the new class: ResourceProbesCollectorBase, where an std::map
> is used for storing the ids of the different probes.
>
> Although, it is not clear why only the tests from
>
> DeformableRegistration12.cxx
> DeformableRegistration13.cxx
>
> are failing.
>
> Since the same class is used in the following tests/examples as well:
>
> DeformableRegistration14.cxx
> DeformableRegistration15.cxx
> DeformableRegistration4.cxx
> DeformableRegistration7.cxx
> DeformableRegistration8.cxx
>
>
> (...?)
>
>
> It would take a bit more time to track and solve this issue...
>
> I would vote for tagging today, and logging a bug report about
> this VS60 problem.
>
>
> Any objections ?
>
>
> Luis
>
>
>
> ---------------------
> Bill Lorensen wrote:
>>
>> Issue B: My cygwin build shows the same failure. The changes that
>> occurred the day it started to fail were all style changes. I looked
>> through them and did not see any obvious candidates for trouble.
>>
>> The Deformable and TimeProbes failure are related I believe. Something
>> to do with the use of <map> in a DLL I think. We say a similar problem
>> a few years ago in MetaDataDictionary. Here are the comment there:
>> // Implement map's api. On some Micorsoft compilers, stl containers
>> // cannot be exported. This causes problems when building DLL's.
>> // Here we inherit privately from std::map and provide a simple
>> // API. The implementation will be in the DLL.
>>
>>
>> Ignore the bias field error. I see this pop up once in a while on
>> various platforms.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ITK 3.10 Release Status
>>> =======================
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a summary of the remaining Dashboard issues:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) gelas.megason.lab: TimeStampTest failed with a Time out:
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207544
>>> May it look like a threading-related problem...?
>>> (this is the only machine where the test fails (today)).
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkTimeStampTest&date=2008-11-02
>>> and the tests was passing before in this machine:
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11800122&build=207544
>>> This is a 64bits machine.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) dash21.kitware : Disk Full
>>> Not really an ITK problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> 3) crl.med.hardvard.edu 64bits ICC 10 Debug
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207498
>>> This seems to be a valid warning.
>>> A virtual function shadowing another one in the base class.
>>> Any objections about fixing this one ?
>>>
>>>
>>> 4) crl.med.hardvard.edu 64bits ICC 10 Release
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207534
>>> same as (3)
>>>
>>>
>>> 5) RogueResearch3 : Mac10.5-InsightReview-gcc-dbg-ppc
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?type=1&buildid=207495
>>> Same as (3,4)
>>>
>>>
>>> 6) Dash14.kitware : Win32-cygwin344
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207702
>>> ResampleImageFilter9Test : Failed
>>> This is the only machine where the test is failing today:
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=ResampleImageFilter9Test&date=2008-11-02
>>> The test started failing in this machine between Oct 17 and 18th:
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11823849&build=207702
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 7) dash13.kitware: Win32-vs60
>>> DeformableRegistration tests are failing (throwing Exceptions):
>>>
>>> DeformableRegistration12Test1
>>> DeformableRegistration12Test2
>>> DeformableRegistration12Test3
>>> DeformableRegistration12Test4
>>> DeformableRegistration13Test1
>>> DeformableRegistration13Test2
>>> DeformableRegistration13Test3
>>> DeformableRegistration13Test4
>>>
>>> This is the only machine where these tests are failing today:
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=DeformableRegistration12Test1&date=2008-11-02
>>>
>>> and the
>>> itkTimeProbesTest (also throwing an Exception):
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=11523633&build=207694
>>>
>>>
>>> 8) BillsLaptop: Win32-bcc5.5-Static
>>> MRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest: Failed
>>> This is the only machine where the test fails:
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=itkMRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest&date=2008-11-02
>>> It seems to be a numerical issue:
>>> "Absolute Avg. error with input and output mask = 33.6037"
>>> "ERROR: sumOfError: 68171 is less than sumOfErrorFinal: 453650"
>>>
>>> In redwall.kitware (for example) this test passes with
>>> the following equivalent output:
>>> "Absolute Avg. error with input and output mask = 0.973767"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=207427
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>>
>>> Suggested action items:
>>>
>>> From the list above, the problems that seem to be worth addressing
>>> before the relase are:
>>>
>>>
>>> A) itkImageToVectorImageFilter::SetNthInput() method issue.
>>>
>>> B) ResampleImageFilter9Test failure in cygwin.
>>> (we need another cygwin build to compare against..)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments and suggestions are welcome
>>>
>>>
>>> Luis
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list