[Insight-developers] Test framework

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Mathieu,

Minor correction:

The text of the UnitTestCpp license:
https://unittest-cpp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/unittest-cpp/UnitTest++/COPYING

doesn't correspond to a BSD license:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php

but to an MIT license:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php

which is a technicality after all, since both licenses could be combined
without any conflict.   :-)


-----


Could you tell us more about your experience with UnitTestCpp  ?

or if you prefer, could you add your comments to the Wiki page:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Proposals:Increasing_ITK_Code_Coverage#UnitTestCpp


The size of the package looks fine. It could fit neatly in
Insight/Utilities...


   Thanks


      Luis


--------------------------
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins <steve at sumost.ca> wrote:
> 
>>Hello,
>>
>>On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 03:51:56PM -0500, Bill Lorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Given the success of "Adopt a Bug", maybe we should initiate a "Cover a Class".
>>
>>Now that I have some holiday time, I'd like to raise the issue of unit
>>testing frameworks.
>>
>>The few test codes that I've looked at are all written out long-hand,
>>without benefit of a modern unit testing framework such as CppUnit or
>>Boost.Test.
> 
> 
> ... or UnitTestCpp :)
> 
> http://unittest-cpp.sourceforge.net/
> 
> Which comes with a BSD like license ;)
> 
> https://unittest-cpp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/unittest-cpp/UnitTest++/COPYING
> 
> I wrote a cmakelists.txt file for it:
> 
> http://gdcm.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gdcm/Sandbox/UnitTest%2B%2B/
> 
> src files are very lightweight "du -sk src" return 712
> 
> 
> 2cts