[Insight-developers] Re: boring IJ's automatic testing

[Gaëtan Lehmann]

Hi Zack,

I have published a new revision whithout the broken wrapper. The build has  
also failed, but because this time there is no space left.  
http://public.kitware.com/InsightJournal/Testing/Sites/WrapITK/Insight_Journal_Automatic_Testing_System/20060727-1513-Experimental/BuildError.html
Can you fix that ? A build with the default options and the three  
languages turned on take about 3GB on my linux box.

Thanks,

Gaetan


Le Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:49:13 +0200, Gaëtan Lehmann  
<gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr> a écrit:

>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to have fixed the bug and for the infos/
> Michael Bell have already reported the build problem. I will have to  
> publish a new revision to fix that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gaetan
>
> Le Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:51:26 +0200, Zack Galbreath  
> <zack.galbreath at kitware.com> a écrit:
>
>> Hi Gaeten,
>>
>> First up, you wanted to know about the versions of some software in the  
>> testing environment:
>> tcl 8.4
>> python 2.4.2
>> cableswig from 3/29/2006
>> sun java 1.4.2
>>
>> Coincidentally, information of this sort is available on the ISC wiki:
>> http://www.insightsoftwareconsortium.org/wiki/index.php/IJ-Testing-Environment
>>
>> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Without answer for more than a month from Zack (yes, remember the  
>>> problem with the watershed article),
>> This is fixed:
>> http://www.insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/view_reviews.php?back=index.php&pubid=92
>> I misunderstood your original email about this issue.  I thought that  
>> you meant that it didn't have a review posted at all (which it did).
>>
>>> I decided to post the new version of WrapITK without waiting for the  
>>> reply to my questions about versions of softs available on the  
>>> automatic testing host.
>>> And it is again broken:
>>>
>>> http://public.kitware.com/InsightJournal/Testing/Sites/WrapITK/Insight_Journal_Automatic_Testing_System/20060726-0858-Experimental/Configure.html  
>>> ITK 2.4.0 ?! What about ITK 2.8.1, released a month ago ?
>>>
>> ITK 2.8.1 has already been built into the InsightJournal testing  
>> environment for some time now.  Your project failed to build properly  
>> because you didn't use the LoadPackage macro from IJMacros.txt:
>> http://insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/documentation/CMake/IJMacros.txt
>>
>> To save you the trouble of submitting a new revision with a modified  
>> CMakeLists.txt, I've "make install"ed  both ITK2.8.1 and CableSwig, and  
>> re-ran your test.  You can view the results here:
>> http://www.insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/view_reviews.php?back=index.php&pubid=85
>> Note that there are still errors.  Contact me off the lists if you need  
>> help resolving them.
>>> I'm bored (again, that's reccurent with ITK) to ask for things to be  
>>> repaired, and to not receive any reply, even to say "I have no time to  
>>> fix that now". I understand that Zack can be very busy, but perhaps  
>>> someone else can reply ? The mails where also sent the itk lists...
>>> And the lack of maintenance make the journal look like work of  
>>> amateurs... not really something where we want to publish the result  
>>> of months of work
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gaetan
>>>
>>> --Gaëtan Lehmann
>>> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
>>> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
>>> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
>>> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr
>>>
>>>
>> -Zack
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Utilisant le client e-mail révolutionnaire d'Opera :  
http://www.opera.com/mail/