[Insight-developers] Re: boring IJ's automatic testing

Zack Galbreath zack.galbreath at kitware.com
Wed Jul 26 12:51:26 EDT 2006


Hi Gaeten,

First up, you wanted to know about the versions of some software in the 
testing environment:
tcl 8.4
python 2.4.2
cableswig from 3/29/2006
sun java 1.4.2

Coincidentally, information of this sort is available on the ISC wiki:
http://www.insightsoftwareconsortium.org/wiki/index.php/IJ-Testing-Environment

Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Without answer for more than a month from Zack (yes, remember the 
> problem with the watershed article),
This is fixed:
http://www.insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/view_reviews.php?back=index.php&pubid=92
I misunderstood your original email about this issue.  I thought that 
you meant that it didn't have a review posted at all (which it did).

> I decided to post the new version of WrapITK without waiting for the 
> reply to my questions about versions of softs available on the 
> automatic testing host.
> And it is again broken:
>
> http://public.kitware.com/InsightJournal/Testing/Sites/WrapITK/Insight_Journal_Automatic_Testing_System/20060726-0858-Experimental/Configure.html 
>
>
> ITK 2.4.0 ?! What about ITK 2.8.1, released a month ago ?
>
ITK 2.8.1 has already been built into the InsightJournal testing 
environment for some time now.  Your project failed to build properly 
because you didn't use the LoadPackage macro from IJMacros.txt:
http://insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/documentation/CMake/IJMacros.txt

To save you the trouble of submitting a new revision with a modified 
CMakeLists.txt, I've "make install"ed  both ITK2.8.1 and CableSwig, and 
re-ran your test.  You can view the results here:
http://www.insight-journal.org/InsightJournalManager/view_reviews.php?back=index.php&pubid=85
Note that there are still errors.  Contact me off the lists if you need 
help resolving them.
> I'm bored (again, that's reccurent with ITK) to ask for things to be 
> repaired, and to not receive any reply, even to say "I have no time to 
> fix that now". I understand that Zack can be very busy, but perhaps 
> someone else can reply ? The mails where also sent the itk lists...
> And the lack of maintenance make the journal look like work of 
> amateurs... not really something where we want to publish the result 
> of months of work
>
> Regards,
>
> Gaetan
>
> --Gaëtan Lehmann
> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr
>
>
-Zack



More information about the Insight-developers mailing list