[Insight-developers] run memtest in multithreaded ?

Gaetan Lehmann gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Fri Oct 7 12:03:35 EDT 2005


On Friday 07 October 2005 16:31, Karthik Krishnan wrote:
> What is happening is:
>
> Your updates correspond to  "Day n" and the submission is dropped off
> onto the public server here on "Day n+1".
> Your build and submission was dropped off  just fine and wouldn't appear
> on the dashboard cause its timestamps were screwed up.
>
> There are 3 options here:
>
> 1. ctest has the option of using
>
> --tomorrow-tag (Nightly or experimental starts with next day tag. This
> is useful if the build will not finish in one day.)
>
> While this is a nice feature, it will surely confuse people who rate
> stability of the system by looking at the nightly dashboard.
>
> 2. Choose a more appropriate time for the builds.
> [ 0100 (GMT) is the nightly start time.]

oh, so http://itk.org/HTML/Testing.htm give a bad start time (1:30 EST)
I'll run the tests earlier.

Thanks

> Yeah I know valgrind builds are painfully slow
>
> 3. What you could do is run the test in parts and ensure that several if
> not all submissions will go through..
>
>  SET (CTEST_COMMAND
>    "/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyStart -D NightlyUpdate -D
> NightlyConfigure -D NightlyBuild -D NightlyTest -D NightlySubmit"
> "/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 0,,4"
> "/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 1,,4"
> "/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 2,,4"
> "/usr/local/bin/ctest -D NightlyMemCheck -D NightlySubmit -I 3,,4" )
>
>
> HTH
> -karthik
>
>
>
>
> (Each 'Day n' is a 24 hr period)
>
> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I now run tests every days for a week, but the results are not in the
> > ITK  dash board. Can you help me to find what is wrong ?
> > The cmake files are attached.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gaetan
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:39:40 +0200, Karthik Krishnan
> >
> > <Karthik.Krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Increase the DART_TESTING_TIMEOUT variable, while configuring using
> >> cmake.. the default is 1500 s, before dart kills the test.
> >>
> >> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have splitted the tests in to parts. It now runs in about 16h.
> >>> There  is  no memory problem while running 2 valgrinds at the same
> >>> time, but  there is  some timeouts:
> >>>
> >>>          82 - itkGoodnessOfFitMixtureModelCostFunctionTest (Timeout)
> >>>         244 - itkLevelSetFunctionTest (Timeout)
> >>>         378 - itkContourMeanDistanceImageFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         526 - itkAdaptiveHistogramEqualizationImageFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         528 - itkAdaptiveHistogramEqualizationImageFilterTest2
> >>> (Timeout)
> >>>         588 - itkCannySegmentationLevelSetImageFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         592 - itkDemonsRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         606 -
> >>> itkGeodesicActiveContourShapePriorLevelSetImageFilterTest_2  (Timeout)
> >>>         630 - itkImageRegistrationMethodTest_16 (Timeout)
> >>>         636 -
> >>> itkKullbackLeiblerCompareHistogramImageToImageMetricTest   (Timeout)
> >>>         640 - itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetricTest
> >>> (Timeout)
> >>>         974 - ImageRegistration2Test (Timeout)
> >>>         978 - ImageRegistration5Test2 (Timeout)
> >>>         980 - ImageRegistration7Test (Timeout)
> >>>         984 - ImageRegistration14Test (Timeout)
> >>>         990 - DeformableRegistration2Test (Timeout)
> >>>         992 - DeformableRegistration4Test (Timeout)
> >>>         994 - DeformableRegistration6Test (Timeout)
> >>>         1024 - GeodesicActiveContourShapePriorCallosumTest (Timeout)
> >>>
> >>>          87 - itkImageToHistogramGeneratorTest (Timeout)
> >>>         103 - itkSampleSelectiveMeanShiftBlurringFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         435 - itkInterpolateImagePointsFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         603 - itkFEMRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         629 - itkImageRegistrationMethodTest_15 (Timeout)
> >>>         645 - itkMRIBiasFieldCorrectionFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         649 - itkMultiResolutionPDEDeformableRegistrationTest (Timeout)
> >>>         667 - itkRegionGrow2DTest (Timeout)
> >>>         689 - itkSymmetricForcesDemonsRegistrationFilterTest (Timeout)
> >>>         971 - ImageRegistration5oTest2 (Timeout)
> >>>         981 - ImageRegistration9Test (Timeout)
> >>>         985 - ImageRegistration15Test (Timeout)
> >>>         991 - DeformableRegistration3Test (Timeout)
> >>>         993 - DeformableRegistration5Test (Timeout)
> >>>         1019 - CellularSegmentation1Test (Timeout)
> >>>
> >>> Is it possible to increase available time for those tests ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Gaetan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:29:10 +0200, Karthik Krishnan
> >>>
> >>> <Karthik.Krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
> >>>> Something to look forward to in the future maybe :)
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/ITK_Roadmap_2005_2006
> >>>>
> >>>> "Add Support for parallel testing in CTest"
> >>>> This will make possible to launch multiple test simultaneously
> >>>> from   CTest. In this way, users with multiprocessor machines will
> >>>> be able  to  reduce the time needed for running the test suite.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> For now, you can just run memory tests every nth day or limit to
> >>>> every  nth test...
> >>>> http://www.itk.org/Testing/Sites/Sabbath.kitware/Linux-g++-3.4-Shared/
> >>>>20050923-0100-Nightly/Notes.html Regards
> >>>> karthik
> >>>>
> >>>> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm trying to run the full memory test. This test is very long
> >>>>> (more   than 24h): it will be a problem to run it each day ;-).
> >>>>> I have noticed that only one proc is used during the test, so is
> >>>>> there  something to do to use the 2 processors ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gaetan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>--- _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Insight-developers mailing list
> >Insight-developers at itk.org
> >http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20051007/6edb63e2/attachment.pgp


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list