[Insight-developers] Dashboard

[Stephen R. Aylward]

thanks -  seems like I need to change the argument type for that function...I'll look at other transforms and see how they do it..I'm stuck in a meeting right now.   I truly appreciate the help!

If I commit a change, could you try the build?

Thanks,
stephen


-----Original Message-----

From:  "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com>
Subj:  Re: [Insight-developers] Dashboard
Date:  Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:37 pm
Size:  4K
To:  "Stephen R. Aylward" <aylward at unc.edu>,   Hans Johnson <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu>,   "Insight-developers (E-mail)" <insight-developers at itk.org>

I am trying it by hand on rapture, and
am getting some warnings and errors.
Here is the warning:

Building executable /home/sci/itk/Dashboards/MyTests/Insight-CC/bin/ImageRegistration7...
cc-1681 CC: WARNING File = /home/sci/itk/Dashboards/MyTests/Insight/Code/Common/itkTranslationTransform.h, Line = 137
  The "bool itk::TranslationTransform<double,
          2U>::GetInverse(itk::TranslationTransform<double, 2U>::Self *) const"
          does not match "itk::Transform<double, 2U, 2U>::GetInverse"--is
          virtual function override intended?

    bool GetInverse(Self* inverse) const;
         ^
          detected during instantiation of class
                    "itk::TranslationTransform<double, 2U>" at line 348 of
                    "/home/sci/itk/Dashboards/MyTests/Insight/Examples/Registra
                    tion/MultiResImageRegistration1.cxx"

         ^

I am doing an experimental to see the error, as it scrolled off the screen....

-Bill

      
At 01:04 PM 3/10/2005, Stephen R. Aylward wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a way to ensure that we get another IRIX build today? 
>
>I think the problem is solved (gcc 3.3 and gcc 3.4 and others),  but...
>
>Stephen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From:  Hans Johnson <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu>
>Subj:  Re: [Insight-developers] Dashboard
>Date:  Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:54 am
>Size:  3K
>To:  "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com>,   "Stephen R. Aylward" <aylward at unc.edu>,   "Insight-developers (E-mail)" <insight-developers at itk.org>
>
>
>
>Does any one have a spare cluster ;).
>
>I've played with distcc http://distcc.samba.org/  a little, and it can do a
>huge build very quickly.
>
>Hans
>
>
>
>On 3/10/05 8:38 AM, "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we should change the continuos builds on some of the slower machines
>> to not do make -i.  That way they will stop at the first error.  To get to the
>> first error is usually very quick, but to build all of itk with an error in
>> a key file takes a long time and produces voluminous dashboard errors.
>> 
>> -Bill
>>  
>> 
>> At 09:27 AM 3/10/2005, Stephen R. Aylward wrote:
>>> More info...
>>> 
>>> About the continuous being green - I must admit that this is not completely
>>> true.  The IRIX64-CC took 6+ hours to report an error.  I submitted at noon,
>>> and the error message was emailed to me after 7pm. So, even though it looked
>>> green during the last several iterations, it was not.   The dashboards are
>>> ordered by the time the build began, not by the time that the results were
>>> generated.
>>> 
>>> Not to make an excuse (or maybe just a small one :) ), perhaps we need more
>>> machines doing continuous builds...the current machines seem swamped.  Linux
>>> CC required 11 hours to do the build.  IRIX64 required nearly 7.   I was left
>>> having to make late night changes and not being able to test them on the
>>> broken platforms.   So, I went to bed last night knowing that I was probably
>>> going to hear from the dashboard-czar :)   I just didn't see a way around it
>>> given the response time.
>>> 
>>> It truly was my mistake for not anticipating the longer build cycle since I
>>> made so many changes.   Sorry about that.   I think it was a one-line bug
>>> that IRIX found, that I didn't completely resolve yesterday, and that is now
>>> fixed.
>>> 
>>> Sorry again,
>>> Stephen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> At 07:52 AM 3/10/2005, Stephen R. Aylward wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry about the dashboard - I truly thought I had taken care of things...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Had green continuous builds....
>>>>> 
>>>>> I will work on these...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Stephen
>>>>> -- ===========================================================
>>>>> Dr. Stephen R. Aylward
>>>>> Associate Professor of Radiology
>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor of Computer Science and Surgery
>>>>> http://caddlab.rad.unc.edu
>>>>> aylward at unc.edu
>>>>> (919) 966-9695
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Insight-developers mailing list
>>>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ===========================================================
>>> Dr. Stephen R. Aylward
>>> Associate Professor of Radiology
>>> Adjunct Associate Professor of Computer Science and Surgery
>>> http://caddlab.rad.unc.edu
>>> aylward at unc.edu
>>> (919) 966-9695
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Insight-developers mailing list
>> Insight-developers at itk.org
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>--- message truncated ---

_
--- message truncated ---