[Insight-developers] New itkTransformBase class

[Julien Jomier]

Hi Hans,

That's great.
I'm not sure that using a factory is a good idea at this point but 
having a common class is certainly good.

Do you already have a common class structure? If not I can try to make 
one and see if this works for you.

Let me know,

Julien

Hans Johnson wrote:
> Julien,
> 
> Here at iowa we have a local copy of some code for reading and writing AIR
> (Automated Image Registration--Roger Woods) affine transformation files into
> ITK.  We also have some work done on reading SPM/Matlab transform files in.
> Should we create a fileIO hierarchy for transforms to match those of images?
> 
> Regards,
> Hans
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-developers-bounces at itk.org
> [mailto:insight-developers-bounces at itk.org] On Behalf Of Julien Jomier
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 7:05 PM
> To: insight-developers at public.kitware.com
> Subject: [Insight-developers] New itkTransformBase class
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm writing a TransformFileReader/Writer based on metaIO.
> For the moment everything is going smoothly. I just need to add a 
> non-templated class between the itkObject and the itkTransform. I came 
> up with an itkTransformBase class from which the current itkTransform 
> derives.
> 
> Let me know if you see any problems in doing so.
> If there is no issue, I'll check the new class in next week,
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Julien
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers