[Insight-developers] Renaming the release from "ITK 1.10' to "ITK2.0"

[Miller, James V (Research)]

I like 1.10.  I don't think there have been enough CHANGES
from 1.8 to warrent indicating a version 2.0.  I would like
to reserve changing the major number to cases where there are 
major architecural changes (meaning potential incompatibility
changes).

Jim



-----Original Message-----
From: insight-developers-bounces at itk.org
[mailto:insight-developers-bounces at itk.org]On Behalf Of Luis Ibanez
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:01 PM
To: Insight Developers List
Subject: [Insight-developers] Renaming the release from "ITK 1.10' to
"ITK2.0"



A last minute change:


  After some brainstorming we concluded that it is better
  to call this release ITK 2.0 instead of ITK 1.10.




  Among the arguments in favor of this naming we have


  a) "1.10" at rapid view looks like a number lower than "1.8"

  b) There are enough changes in the release to justify
     a major version number.
     http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_1.10

  c) 2.5 years have passed since we released "ITK 1.0"
     (October 2002). Using "ITK 2.0" fairly reflects the
     fact that the toolkit has matured over this time.



If anybody has objections to the new naming please let
us know..... fast!



   Thanks


      Luis




_______________________________________________
Insight-developers mailing list
Insight-developers at itk.org
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers