[Insight-developers] [ITK + Wrapping (Python)] Wrappingclasses proposal - V.3

Benoit Regrain benoit.regrain at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
Tue Aug 2 04:31:04 EDT 2005


No, because I'm writting these files in multi-pass, using FILE_WRITE with 
the
APPEND flag. And due to the keep of the actual file list, it seems 
impossible
with the CONFIGURE_FILE command.

In CMake, how could I could I have a return variable in a macro ?
I don't success to have a macro like the SET command.
Is anyone help me to do that ?

Cheers
Benoit Regrain


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com>
To: "Gaetan Lehmann" <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>
Cc: <insight-developers at itk.org>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] [ITK + Wrapping (Python)] Wrappingclasses 
proposal - V.3


> At 03:08 PM 8/1/2005, Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>
>
>>We are talking about the wrapper system done by Benoit where wrap_*.cxx 
>>files
>>are generated by cmake.
>>This system introduce great things:
>> + consistent naming
>> + ability to create code in wrapped language at build time
>> + ...
> OK, so, are you using CONFIGURE_FILE to write the wrap_*.cxx files?
> If so, it should do a copy if different, and the files should not change.
>
> -Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers 



More information about the Insight-developers mailing list