[Insight-developers] [ITK + Wrapping (Python)] Wrappingclasses
proposal - V.3
Benoit Regrain
benoit.regrain at creatis.insa-lyon.fr
Tue Aug 2 04:31:04 EDT 2005
No, because I'm writting these files in multi-pass, using FILE_WRITE with
the
APPEND flag. And due to the keep of the actual file list, it seems
impossible
with the CONFIGURE_FILE command.
In CMake, how could I could I have a return variable in a macro ?
I don't success to have a macro like the SET command.
Is anyone help me to do that ?
Cheers
Benoit Regrain
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com>
To: "Gaetan Lehmann" <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>
Cc: <insight-developers at itk.org>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] [ITK + Wrapping (Python)] Wrappingclasses
proposal - V.3
> At 03:08 PM 8/1/2005, Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
>
>
>>We are talking about the wrapper system done by Benoit where wrap_*.cxx
>>files
>>are generated by cmake.
>>This system introduce great things:
>> + consistent naming
>> + ability to create code in wrapped language at build time
>> + ...
> OK, so, are you using CONFIGURE_FILE to write the wrap_*.cxx files?
> If so, it should do a copy if different, and the files should not change.
>
> -Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list