[Insight-developers] Wrapping and gcc 3.4
Lorensen, William E (Research)
lorensen at crd.ge.com
Fri Apr 1 09:00:42 EST 2005
It would be great if Kitware could run a continuous with wrapping turned on. The itkAffineTransform was incorrectly being included in itkImage.txx.
-----Original Message-----
From: insight-developers-bounces at itk.org
[mailto:insight-developers-bounces at itk.org]On Behalf Of William A.
Hoffman
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:52 AM
To: Brad King; hans-johnson at uiowa.edu
Cc: Insight-developers (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] Wrapping and gcc 3.4
There were no massive or any changes in CableSwig.
The problem came from this checkin:
http://www.itk.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Code/Common/itkImage.txx.diff?
by Dan Blezek. Some include files were removed from itkImage.txx and
this broke the file itkCSwigImages.h that depended on those includes,
I have checked in a fix:
$ cvs commit -m "BUG: add missing includes" itkCSwigImages.h
/cvsroot/Insight/Insight/Wrapping/CSwig/itkCSwigImages.h,v <-- itkCSwigImages.
h
new revision: 1.9; previous revision: 1.8
-Bill
At 08:34 AM 4/1/2005, Brad King wrote:
>Hans Johnson wrote:
>>This one little change did fix the wrapping problem for 1 day. Then
>>hundreds of files changed in the CableSwig directory and all wrappping
>>on all platforms is now failing.
>>I can not find the CableSwig dashboard, or any way to determine what is
>>going on with CableSwig. I've turned of all wrapping testing at iowa,
>>but this is just a short term solution.
>>I've been building wrapping on all our platforms for quite awhile by
>>updating both CableSwig and Insight each night (this was the recommended
>>way of doing it in the past).
>
>There is no CableSwig dashboard...it is used only to wrap ITK. What do you mean by "hundreds" of files in the CableSwig directory? No major changes have been there recently. The only big wrapping change recently was to split Insight/Wrapping/CSwig/Common into CommonA and CommonB. Those changes worked on both Linux and Windows before I committed them. I'll investigate the current failures.
>
>-Brad
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
_______________________________________________
Insight-developers mailing list
Insight-developers at itk.org
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list