[Insight-developers] Unified CVS commit tags

[Andy Cedilnik]

Hi Bill,

Exactly. So, BUG clearly refers to runtime problem, where as FIX can be
just about anything.

			Andy

On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 17:38, Bill Lorensen wrote:
> I think COMP: handles compile time fixes.
> 
> At 05:19 PM 10/5/2004, Andy Cedilnik wrote:
> >Hi Bill,
> >
> >The problem with FIX is that it is not clear if it is compile time fix
> >or run time fix.
> >
> >The NEW and ENH is pretty much the same thing. NEW does not actually add
> >any more information.
> >
> >                         Andy
> >
> >On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:25, Lorensen, William E (Research) wrote:
> > > I agree with Jim that FIX is better than BUG. NEW is also good. I sometimes
> > > use PORT for portability issues, but that is not that big a deal.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Miller, James V (Research) [mailto:millerjv at crd.ge.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:10 AM
> > > To: 'Luis Ibanez'
> > > Cc: Insight Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] Unified CVS commit tags
> > >
> > >
> > > If BUG is what we already agreed upon, then most of my "fixes" have the
> > > wrong comment line.  I almost always use "FIX:"
> > >
> > > Should there be a "NEW: " tag to identify when something new is added
> > > to the repository.  If usually just do something like "First checkin"
> > >
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Luis Ibanez [mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:46 AM
> > > To: Miller, James V (Research)
> > > Cc: Insight Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] Unified CVS commit tags
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jim,
> > >
> > > I personnaly agree with you in that "FIX" sounds
> > > more positive than "BUG"...
> > >
> > > However, in the ITK Developers document, "BUG" is
> > > the entry that we already agreed on.
> > >
> > >      Insight/Documentation/
> > >               InsightDevelopersStart.doc
> > >               InsightDevelopersStart.pdf
> > >
> > >
> > > In fact,
> > > the only suggested tag that is new for ITK is "COMP".
> > >
> > > "COMP" reflects situations like the lack of "typename"
> > > which is not exactly a bug, but where, a modification
> > > of the code will make possible for it to compile in
> > > specific platforms. The same situation happens with the
> > > use of the StaticConstMacro that makes possible to
> > > compile for Borland and VC 6.0.
> > >
> > >
> > >     Luis
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > Miller, James V (Research) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I prefer FIX: rather than BUG:
> > > >
> > > > I don't like commiting bugs.  But I do like commiting fixes.
> > > >
> > > > COMP feels a little weird to me, but I can probably adapt.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Luis Ibanez [mailto:luis.ibanez at kitware.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:31 AM
> > > > To: Insight Developers List
> > > > Subject: [Insight-developers] Unified CVS commit tags
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We are considering unifying CVS commit tags among several projects
> > > > (ITK, VTK, CMake, and ParaView) and we came up with the following list:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   BUG:  a change made to fix a runtime issue (crash or incorrect results)
> > > >
> > > >   COMP: a fix for a compilation issue, error or warning
> > > >
> > > >   ENH: new functionality added to the project
> > > >
> > > >   PERF: performance improvement
> > > >
> > > >   STYLE: a change that doesn't impact the logic or execution of the code
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This list is not too far from what we have been using up to this point.
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody have any objection with adapting the cvs
> > > > commit convention in ITK ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >        Luis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > > Insight-developers at itk.org
> > > > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > > Insight-developers at itk.org
> > > > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > Insight-developers at itk.org
> > > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > Insight-developers at itk.org
> > > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >--
> >                                 Andy Cedilnik
> >                                 Kitware Inc.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Insight-developers mailing list
> >Insight-developers at itk.org
> >http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
-- 
				Andy Cedilnik
				Kitware Inc.