[Insight-developers] SpatialObjects
Stephen R. Aylward
aylward at unc . edu
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:03:02 -0500
A line has two normals, a plane has one normal. This is consistent
within the major spatial objects.
Our line is not a polyline. Perhaps it is a curve. Two points, each
with two normals can describe a curve.
Why is it surprising to need different code to read in lines, landmarks,
and contours (polygons?)? They are entirely different structures -
different geometric requirements are needed to define their components.
I hesitate to write converters from landmarks to lines - they really are
different.
Stephen
Julien Jomier wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I see the issue. Can we just create a function AddPoint(float* Position)?
> Yes, a LineSpatialObject is a polyline (Should we rename it?)
> A LineSpatialObject has N-1 normals as well as TubeSpatialObject. A
> SurfaceSpatialObject has only 1 normal.
>
> Julien
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-developers-admin at itk . org
> [mailto:insight-developers-admin at itk . org] On Behalf Of Miller, James V
> (Research)
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: 'Julien Jomier'; 'Insight-developers (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] SpatialObjects
>
>
> The issue was not in querying a point after the object was created. The
> issue was in creating the spatial objects. I want to use one block of code
> to read the points from a file and then pass those points to appropriate
> type of spatial object. But different types of spatial objects use
> different types of points. So you have to "duplicate" the code to build
> your point lists since a different type of list is needed for each spatial
> object type. One solution may be to allow a line spatial object to accept
> points without normals as well as points with normals.
> Why does a line have N-1 normals? Is this really a polyline with N points
> (and hence N-1 segments)? Why does a line need a normal but other spatial
> objects do not?
>
>>2) LineSpatialObject::SetPoints() takes a list of LineSpatialObjectPoint
>
> whereas
>
>>PolygonSpatialObject::SetPoints() and LandmarkSpatialObject::SetPoints()
>
> take lists of
>
>>SpatialObjectPoint. It looks like LineSpatialObjectPoints have a vector
>
> associated with them.
>
>>This meant I had to duplicate code to read landmarks, lines, and polygons
>
> since I couldn't read
>
>>the points into a common data structure and then decide whether to it is a
>
> line, polygon, or
>
>>landmark.
>
>
> A LineSpatialObjectPoint has N-1 normals associated with it.
> A LineSpatialObjectPoint derives from SpatialObjectPoint so you shouldn't
> have to duplicate code when you are asking for the position of the point
> only.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk . org
> http://www . itk . org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
--
===========================================================
Dr. Stephen R. Aylward
Associate Professor of Radiology
Adjunct Associate Professor of Computer Science and Surgery
http://caddlab . rad . unc . edu
aylward at unc . edu
(919) 966-9695