[Insight-developers] Insight Cable Swig building in 1.4.0
William A. Hoffman
billlist at nycap . rr . com
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:39:08 -0400
There is not a bug here. If you put CableSwig in the Utilities directory,
then it will be built with ITK. If it is not there, it will look for a system
CableSwig. It was felt that CableSwig was too big to be in the ITK repository.
However, for ease of building, if you untar, or cvs checkout CableSwig into the
Utilities directory it will be built as part of ITK.
-Bill
At 03:37 PM 10/21/2003, Hans J. Johnson wrote:
>Hello Cable Swig Team,
>
>It looks like a CMakeLists.txt update was missed in the 1.4.0 release
>(and current CVS) when the CableSwig was moved from Utilities to
>Wrapping.
>
>I don't really know what is going on here, but this just looks like a
>mistake.
>
># Find CableSwig if necessary.
>IF(ITK_NEED_CableSwig)
> IF(EXISTS ${ITK_SOURCE_DIR}/Utilities/CableSwig)
>....
>blah
>....
> ELSE(EXISTS ${ITK_SOURCE_DIR}/Utilities/CableSwig)
>....
>blah
>....
>ENDIF(EXISTS ${ITK_SOURCE_DIR}/Utilities/CableSwig)
>
>1) Should ${ITK_SOURCE_DIR}/Utilities/CableSwig be
>${ITK_SOURCE_DIR}/Wrapping/CSwig?
>
>2) Why do the IF and ELSE parts both have the same conditions?
>
>Regards,
>Hans
>
>
>PS: I found this while trying to figure out why the build system is
>using a (defunct) system wide version of CableSwig rather than the fresh
>copy with each build.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers at itk . org
>http://www . itk . org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers