[Insight-developers] RE: ImageRegistration Test 16 added

[Blezek, Daniel J (Research)]

Luis,

  Many thanks to you!  Since I'm not actively working on Insight, I can only advise: should we think
about having more multiple datatype tests?  In this case, it isn't much of a pain, but in other tests
it might be.  Anytime we run algorithms on multiple data types, they get better.

Thanks again for great work Luis and Lydia,
-dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Ibanez [mailto:luis.ibanez@kitware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 4:21 PM
To: Blezek, Daniel J (Research)
Cc: holmesd3@yahoo.com; Lydia Ng; Insight-Developers
Subject: ImageRegistration Test 16 added



Hi Daniel,

I just commited the RegistrationTest_16
that you implemented.

After the changes on the RecursiveGaussianFilter
the test is doing better for most pixel types.

It is failing only for <char>...

Here is the current output:

> <unsigned char>:  1
> <char>:           0
> <unsigned short>: 1
> <short>:          1
> <unsigned int>:   1
> <int>:            1
> <unsigned long>:  1
> <long>:           1
> <float>:          1
> <double>:         1



Thanks for contributing this test.


   Regards,


     Luis


------------------


Blezek, Daniel J (Research) wrote:
> Luis (Dave),
> 
>   Attached is the test I modified from itkImageRegistrationMethodTest_1 ( now _16).  Here is the
end
> result (10 data types, 4 minutes to compile on a 1.7G linux box):
> 
> <unsigned char>: 0
> <char>: 0
> <unsigned short>: 0
> <short>: 1
> <unsigned int>: 0
> <int>: 1
> <unsigned long>: 0
> <long>: 1
> <float>: 1
> <double>: 1
> 
> Interesting!
> -dan
>