[Insight-developers] Question about delete on VC++

Jisung Kim bahrahm@yahoo.com
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:52:37 -0700 (PDT)


The print out result shows exact match between
addresses of pointer (to nodes) and the order. 


--- Jisung Kim <bahrahm@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In a same thread.
> 
> I will do printing out address of nodes in creation
> and deletion in VC++ too. And let you know the
> result.
> 
> --- "Miller, James V (Research)"
> <millerjv@crd.ge.com>
> wrote:
> > Are those in different threads?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jisung Kim [mailto:bahrahm@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:48 PM
> > > To: Miller, James V (Research); insight-dev-list
> > > Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] Question about
> > delete on VC++
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, the tree was created by the
> > > itkWeightedCenteroidKdTreeGenerator and the
> > deletion
> > > logic is inside of the itkKdTree.
> > > 
> > > Is it a problem?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- "Miller, James V (Research)"
> > <millerjv@crd.ge.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Another thought.  Is the data allocated in one
> > > > thread and destroyed
> > > > in another thread?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Miller, James V (Research) 
> > > > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:07 PM
> > > > > To: 'Jisung Kim'; insight-dev-list
> > > > > Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] Question
> > about
> > > > delete on VC++
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Strange.  If we were building Dlls, I would
> > say
> > > > that maybe we were
> > > > > allocating nodes in one DLL and deallocating
> > them
> > > > in another DLL.
> > > > > (I think each DLL has its own heap
> > management).
> > > > But since we are 
> > > > > not building DLLs, then that is not the
> > problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Have you run with VC the version that prints
> > out
> > > > all the node
> > > > > allocation and deletions?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is there anything "inside" a node that is
> not
> > > > being deleted? 
> > > > > Perhaps a 
> > > > > subitem is missing a destructor that needs
> to
> > do
> > > > something 
> > > > > that another
> > > > > compiler is providing by default.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Friday, September 27, 2002 10:16 AM
> > > > > > To: insight-dev-list
> > > > > > Subject: [Insight-developers] Question
> about
> > > > delete on VC++
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have a question for memory deallocation
> in
> > > > VC++.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Currently, my
> > itkKdTreeBasedKmeansEstimatorTest
> > > > is
> > > > > > leaking memory on VC++ machine. It seems
> > like
> > > > that the
> > > > > > some of the k-d tree nodes has not been
> > deleted.
> > > > > > However, On linux, it didn't have any
> leak.
> > I
> > > > traced
> > > > > > the creation and deletion of nodes by
> print
> > out
> > > > the
> > > > > > address of each nodes. And the result
> shows
> > > > perfect
> > > > > > match between creation and deletion.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is there anything more than calling
> "delete"
> > to
> > > > delete
> > > > > > an object. I think I read an article from
> MS
> > > > about
> > > > > > using delete and also assign zero to the
> > pointer
> > > > to
> > > > > > properly delete object in a long time ago.
> > Is it
> > > > the
> > > > > > case? Should I assign zero to the pointer
> > after
> > > > > > calling delete?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > =====
> > > > > > Jisung Kim
> > > > > > bahrahm@yahoo.com
> > > > > > 106 Mason Farm Rd.
> > > > > > 129 Radiology Research Lab., CB# 7515
> > > > > > Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> > > > > > Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7515
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> > > > > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > > > > Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > > > > 
> > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > > > Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > > > 
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > Insight-developers mailing list
> > > > Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> > > 
> > > 
> > > =====
> > > Jisung Kim
> > > bahrahm@yahoo.com
> > > 106 Mason Farm Rd.
> > > 129 Radiology Research Lab., CB# 7515
> > > Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> > > Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7515
> > > 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Insight-developers mailing list
> > Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> >
>
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> 
> 
> =====
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
Jisung Kim
bahrahm@yahoo.com
106 Mason Farm Rd.
129 Radiology Research Lab., CB# 7515
Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7515

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com