[Insight-developers] vnl_svd on Borland compiler

[Aljaz Noe]

Do you have any ideas, what could be going wrong inside the svd on
Borland?

Aljaz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Hoffman [mailto:bill.hoffman@kitware.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: Aljaz Noe; insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com; 
> 'Miller, James V (Research)'
> Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] vnl_svd on Borland compiler
> 
> 
> I think we need to fix svd or say that the borland compiler 
> is not supported.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> 
> At 10:17 AM 10/2/2002 -0400, Aljaz Noe wrote:
> >> While that indeed seems to be a problem.  Why are using an
> >> SVD to compute a determinant? vnl_determinant<> will switch 
> >> between using a brute force determinant and qr decomposition.
> >
> >I didn't know that vnl_determinant<> exists. It's not in the doxygen 
> >documentation.
> >
> >> Does vnl_determinant produce the correct answer?
> >
> >It does. I've changed the code, but this doesn't solve the 
> problem yet, 
> >because we're using svd to do other stuff, like inverting matrices, 
> >which again, doesn't work on Borland.
> >
> >Is there any alternative to using vnl_svd_inverse<>(matrix)?
> >
> >Aljaz
> 
>