[Insight-developers] SmartPointer comparison operators

[Aljaz Noe]

No. But I'm using a const set<SmartPointer>, which means that operator< has
to be defined.

Otherwise I agree that this would be a very cool thing to have. It would be
very simple to create containers for polymorphic objects. And we need a lot
of those in FEM code...

Aljaz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com
> [mailto:insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com]On Behalf Of Luis
> Ibanez
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:54 AM
> To: Aljaz Noe
> Cc: Insight Developers
> Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] SmartPointer comparison operators
>
>
>
> Aljaz,
>
> The changes in SmartPointer have been checked in.
>
> Out of curiosity:
> Are you using SmartPointers directly as Iterators in STL algorithms ?
>
> That's a powerful use that we may not have exploited yet.
>
>
>    Thanks
>
>       Luis
>
> ========================
>
> Aljaz Noe wrote:
>
> >Thanks. Some of the FEM code crashed because of that, if we used
> >SmartPointers.
> >
> >Aljaz
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>