[Insight-developers] excluding part of code from compilation

[Aljaz Noe]

Yes. That is the main problem. And I would rather leave the original itpack
code intact if that is possible.

Making the functions static was not the right solution, since other
compilers reported a lot of warnings about functions being never used. I
figured, that by making functions static only on the problematic pragmatic
machine, would solve the problem.

Aljaz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com
> [mailto:insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com]On Behalf Of
> Lorensen, William E (Research)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:02 PM
> To: 'Aljaz Noe'; Insight-Developers
> Subject: RE: [Insight-developers] excluding part of code from
> compilation
>
>
> There are deeper problems I think. The unresolved symbols seem to
> be redeclared in the included file.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aljaz Noe [mailto:noe@grasp.cis.upenn.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: Insight-Developers
> Subject: [Insight-developers] excluding part of code from compilation
>
>
> Hi!
>
> How can I prevent a part of code from compiling on pragmatic?
> What macro is defined on the compiler
> on that machine?
>
> Aljaz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>