[Insight-developers] RE: Lost Coverage

[Blezek, Daniel J (CRD)]

I'm not sure I agree with this philosophy, but I noticed that he put an "If UNIX" around the targets,
which makes sense for UNIX users, since you can't make heads nor tails of the CMake generated
makefiles anyway.  I put the coverage stuff inside the UNIX block.

-dan

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Miller, James V (CRD)  
> Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:37 AM
> To:	Blezek, Daniel J (CRD); 'insight-developers@public.kitware.com'; Dart (E-mail)
> Cc:	Lorensen, William E (CRD)
> Subject:	RE: Lost Coverage
> 
> I knew about this.  With Kitware down and the exception madness I was working through last week,  I
> just didn't get around to do anything about it.
> 
> Ken is trying to reduce the number of make targets that Dart creates.  So the only the standard
> Experimental/Nightly targets are constructed.  The thought was that most users would not be doing
> coverage or purify.  "Advanced" users would have to run the coverage and purify tcl scripts
> explictly.
> 
> Now that I have thought about it a second time, I think we should put in a CMake option that would
> create the additional targets. The user could set "ALL_DART_TARGETS" (or something) in the cache or
> through the gui to "on" to get the rest of the targets.
> 
> 
> 
> 	 -----Original Message-----
> 	From: 	Blezek, Daniel J (CRD)  
> 	Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 12:08 PM
> 	To:	'insight-developers@public.kitware.com'
> 	Cc:	Miller, James V (CRD); Lorensen, William E (CRD)
> 	Subject:	Lost Coverage
> 
> 	Guys,
> 
> 	  It seems that CMake's Dart module was changed some time ago in a refactoring that included
> removing the NightlyCoverage makefile target.  So of course, coverage information has not been
> available.  I've checked this back into CMake, and will be updating our systems to get coverage
> information back in place.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	-dan