[Insight-developers] Fwd: ITK

[Ross Whitaker]

Yes, I agree.  However, should we put together a set of guidelines for people.   In other words, should we inform them that the toolkit is built around a common software infrastructure, which they can have and use, and is not intended to be merely a repository for
segmentation-related code?

Regards,

Ross

Kitware wrote:

> FYI- I've received a couple of inquiries like this so far. I'd like to start building the ITK community by encouraging this sort of effort (contributing code, etc.). Does anyone have a problem with this? I think it's consistent with our year-end, public beta goal.
>
> Will
>
> >Sender: peter@newmail.DKFZ-Heidelberg.DE
> >Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:16:04 +0200
> >From: Peter Hassenpflug <P.Hassenpflug@dkfz-heidelberg.de>
> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-SMP i686)
> >X-Accept-Language: en
> >To: kitware@kitware.com
> >Subject: ITK
> >
> >Dear Kitware-Team,
> >
> >is it true that you are working on an ITK (image processing toolkit:
> >segmentation, registration, ...) similar to VTK? If so, we can
> >contribute some segmentation algorithms we are using in our clinical
> >applications. Some details concerning ITK and possibilites for
> >contributing are very welcome.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

--
Ross T. Whitaker, Assistant Professor
50 S. Central Campus Drive, Rm. 3190
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT  84112-9205
voice: 801/587-9549, fax: 801/581-5843
web: www.cs.utah.edu/~whitaker