[Insight-developers] Infinite loops
Lydia Ng
lng@insightful.com
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:58:27 -0700
Hi Dan,
Linux-2.2.14-5.0smp-c++
is definitely running an old version of my
itkImageToImageAffineMutualInformationGradientDescentRegistrationTest
I added some printout statements about 7 days ago,
but they haven't appear in the output.
Lydia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com
> [mailto:insight-developers-admin@public.kitware.com]On Behalf Of Luis
> Ibanez
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 7:28 AM
> To: Daniel J. Blezek, Ph.D.
> Cc: luis.ibanez@ieee.org; insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] Infinite loops
>
>
> Daniel,
>
>
> I don't have access right now to a Linux machine, so
> I'm trying to identify the problem directly from the
> code and the outputs on the dashboard. However, something
> seems to be wrong among the outputs reported on the dashboard:
>
> When you killed the tests, where they still printing output ?
>
> This is for this morning for
> itkImageToImageTranslationMeanSquaresGradientDescent
>
> Iterations Answer(should be -7,-3) Final Message
>
> Irix: 200 -6.99351 -2.99616 Test passed
>
>
> Intel C++ 200 -6.99351 -2.99616 Test Passed
>
>
> Linux 2.4.0 GetValue() messages are present (as expected)
> 200 -6.99351 -2.99616 Test Passed
> But... a segmentation violation is reported at the end.
>
>
> Linux 2.2.14 the GetValue() messages are missing(!), the number of
> iterations
> is not being printed, the reported solution is
> -7.15854 -3.00822
> and a segmentation violation is reported.
> This definitely looks like an older version of the test.
> It seems that the update from the repository have some
> problem... (?)
>
> SunOS 5.7 Very similar to Linux 2.2.14. Messages added
> recently are
> missing.
> The reported output is:
> -7.1584 -3.00822
> and a segmentation violation is reported.
>
>
>
> The tests are explicitly limited to 200 iterations, they shouldn't be
> going in infinite loops. One possible source of error is that inside
> the Mapper we are using exceptions to report when a point is outside
> the range of the target image, the number of these exceptions can be
> quite large (as high as the number of pixels in the image), and it is
> not clear how each compiler manage this high flow of exceptions. I'd
> notice that in VC++ the debuger is overloaded a cause of the
> high number
> of exceptions. My guess is that the gcc compiler expects
> exceptions to
> be an not so common event (this code could be throwing about
> 2000 of the
> in each iterations). In that case we should replace the code:
>
>
> try {
> value = mapper.GetValue( point );
> }
> catch()
> {
> value = 0;
> }
>
>
>
> for a "contract" style code with a preconditions like:
>
>
> if( mapper.IsPointInside( point ) )
> {
> value = mapper.GetValue();
> }
> else
> {
> value = 0;
> }
>
>
>
> I'll remove those test until I can try them on a Linux machine.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Luis
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> "Daniel J. Blezek, Ph.D." wrote:
> >
> > Luis,
> >
> > When I came in this morning, I killed these jobs which
> had been running
> > since Saturday morning. Do you have access to a Linux
> machine to do some
> > testing? Oddly enough, it only seems to be affecting my RedHat 6.2
> > machine, not the RedHat 7.0 machine. Could be a compiler
> difference.
> >
> > -dan
> >
> > >
> > > "Blezek, Daniel J (CRD)" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've had to regularly kill the following tests on Linux
> > > >
> > > >
> ./itkImageToImageTranslationNormalizedCorrelationGradientDesce
> ntRegistrationTest
> > > >
> ./itkImageToImageTranslationMeanSquaresRegularStepGradientDesc
> entRegistrationTest
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas where the code may be having a problem?
> > > >
> > > > -dan
> > > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>