[IGSTK-Users] igstk crosshair issue

[Yusuf OEZBEK]

Hello Gomez

Thank you for your answer. The problem would actually the orientation (0.09/0.0098/-0-02/.....) of ct-images with gantry tilt value. If the orientation is set to 1.0/0.0/0.0/0.0/1.0/0.0 in the image header, then all the crosshairs displayed properly.

 






Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Yusuf ÖZBEK


________________________________
 Von: Alvaro Gomez <agomez at fing.edu.uy>
An: igstk-users at public.kitware.com 
Gesendet: 17:04 Montag, 30.September 2013
Betreff: Re: [IGSTK-Users] igstk crosshair issue
 


Maybe this is related to:

http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/igstk-users/2010-November/000968.html
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/igstk-users/2011-August/001207.html



On 09/30/2013 09:21 AM, Yusuf OEZBEK wrote:

Dear IGSTK users,
>
>I have a problem with the
            igstkCrossHairObjectRepresentation. The crosshair is always
            represented in the background of displayed ct-images (only
            for axial view) and it is remarkable, that it only happens
            in some ct image dataset. Not at all. You see two
            screenshots in the attachment, to better understand the
            problem . What can be the reason for this? Image
            oriantation? Slice tickness?
>
>
>
>Thank you!
>
> 
>Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>Yusuf ÖZBEK
>
>
>_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/igstk-users


_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/igstk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/igstk-users/attachments/20131001/b0f20113/attachment-0001.html>