[Dart] Sweeping Dart changes
Bill Hoffman
bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:00:59 -0500
I'll give it a try, but my concern was more about the design.
If a new path gets added, a dart developer will have to try and
figure out if it needs to be cygwin'ifed. Seems like it would be
safer to run all of them through it.
-Bill
At 12:49 PM 1/22/2002 -0500, Blezek, Daniel J (CRD) wrote:
>Bill,
>
> I put in the MangledPathNames option all the options that were previously mangled by Dart. So
>unless I missed something, this should be backwards compatable. Can you try this on a Cygwin setup?
>
>-dan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill Hoffman [mailto:bill.hoffman at kitware.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:42 PM
>> To: Blezek, Daniel J (CRD); 'dart at public.kitware.com'
>> Subject: Re: [Dart] Sweeping Dart changes
>>
>>
>> This one is a bit concerning:
>>
>> At 12:14 PM 1/22/2002 -0500, Blezek, Daniel J (CRD) wrote:
>> >- Any paths that Cygwin needs to mangle must be listed in
>> the MangledPathNames option
>>
>> Don't all paths have to be cygwin mangled for cygwin?
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Dart mailing list
>Dart at public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/dart