From pieper at isomics.com Tue Nov 24 09:37:52 2015 From: pieper at isomics.com (Steve Pieper) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi CTKers - Just FYI about discussions we are having leading up to project week in January. Anyone who's interested is welcome to join. -Steve ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andras Lasso Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:23 PM Subject: RE: IGT software collaboration intro meeting To: Christian Askeland , Simon Drouin < drouin.simon at gmail.com>, Junichi Tokuda , Steve Pieper , Tamas Ungi , Adam Rankin < arankin at robarts.ca> Cc: "Kapur, Tina,Ph.D." , "Norton, Isaiah" < inorton at bwh.harvard.edu>, Alireza Mehrtash , Prashin Unadkat , "tormod.selbekk at sintef.no" < tormod.selbekk at sintef.no>, Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng < Janne.Beate.Lervik.Bakeng at sintef.no>, Ingerid Reinertsen < Ingerid.Reinertsen at sintef.no>, Thomas Lang? , Frank Lindseth , "D. Louis Collins" < louis.collins at mcgill.ca>, Gabor Fichtinger Hi all, Thanks for the very productive meeting today. I?ve uploaded the meeting minutes to the NAMIC week?s project page (thanks to Christian for the inputs): http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2016_Winter_Project_Week:TrackedUltrasoundStandardization We plan to have one or two more similar meetings before the project week to continue the discussion. For all those who plan to attend the project week: please request an account at the NAMIC wiki ( http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Special:RequestAccount). It?ll allow you to register to the event, edit the project page, etc. Andras *From:* Andras Lasso *Sent:* November 19, 2015 6:06 PM *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < drouin.simon at gmail.com>; 'Junichi Tokuda' ; Steve Pieper ; Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth ; D. Louis Collins < louis.collins at mcgill.ca>; Tamas Ungi ; Gabor Fichtinger < fichting at queensu.ca> *Subject:* IGT software collaboration intro meeting Hi all, Thanks for the doodle poll responses. Based on those, *November 23, Monday, 9am EST* (probably 3pm Norway time) is the most suitable. You should be able to join the meeting through the google hangout link on this page: https://plus.google.com/events/ceo6eum5ja3rhjgjed29eiu67b8?authkey=COHXmfavj620Fg This will be an informal meeting to get to know each other and define priorities for the next couple of months, in preparation for the project week in January. Andras *From:* Andras Lasso *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:04 PM *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < drouin.simon at gmail.com> *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee Whiteway ; D. Louis Collins < louis.collins at mcgill.ca> *Subject:* RE: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi all, Christian, thanks for the great summary of topics, these would all serve as good basis of collaboration and convergence in IGT software. We?ve recently had a discussion at Montreal Neurological Institute (Louis D Collins? group: Simon Drouin, Ian Gerard, Marta Kersten, et al.), they are also very interested in integrating/migrating their software to 3DSlicer-SlicerIGT-Plus, share algorithms, etc, and they, too, will come to the project week to Boston in January. I would suggest to have a teleconference to introduce ourselves to each other and discuss what topics we should focus on first. Christian, Simon (and everyone else interested in this Project week planning meeting), please mark your availability in this doodle poll: http://doodle.com/poll/9u5vqbtr4qk6famg Thanks, Andras *From:* Christian Askeland [mailto:Christian.Askeland at sintef.no ] *Sent:* November 17, 2015 1:05 PM *To:* Andras Lasso *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee Whiteway *Subject:* Re: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi Andras, Gabor, all, Your suggesion regarding EU Twinning Programme came at the perfect time for me - I was just about to send you, Andras, an email regarding the Winter Project Week in January. We have discussed a bit in an email thread originating in the OpenIGTLink list some weeks ago, I?ll continue from there. Our group will be present in Boston with 1-2 software people, so it would be great to start the work there, and then continue in Heidelberg and beyond. We would like to work in integration of CustusX+PLUS, and on IGT standardization in general. I hope both of these topics are of interest to you. In Boston we will focus the work on CustusX+PLUS, but we can also discuss standardization (also including the Slicer people and others) and then focus more on this in Heidelberg, as I imagine this topic will need time to mature. Below is a quick first draft of my thoughts. Andras, please iterate and/or suggest topics. *Proposal for cooperation projects PerkLab/PLUS group, SINTEF/CustusX group, (+ others).* *Enhance connection of CustusX client to PLUS server:* Background: CustusX has used PLUS to connect to an Ultrasonix scanner with an attached tracking device from Ascension (Sonix GPS), as part of the EU RASimAs project. CustusX also has tracking support from the IGSTK toolkit, and own direct support for a number of video/US devices. We would like to add PLUS to this family, poosibly replacing some of our older components. Topics: ? Tracking of BrainLab devices. ? Connection to BK medical scanners. ? Enhance transfer of US probe metadata. Might include extending the OpenIGTLink standard. ? Use of PLUS US reconstruction algorithms in CustusX as an alternative to CX internal algorithms, and enable comparison of algorithms. *Standardization of IGT software.* Background: ? Emails, major players converge towards IGTLink. Several groups are using PLUS and/or Slicer, but also open-sourcing their own software and want to be compatible with each other. ? Data should be usable by several systems in order to ease comparison in e.g. studies. ? Our group need to communicate models and volumes with Slicer, and would like to use PLUS. There are several areas where standardization would be beneficial: ? messaging between applications. ? file formats. ? algorithms/shared libraries. It is important to build as much as possible on existing material and de facto standards. Topics: ? Messaging: OpenIGTLink is the de facto standard for messaging. Is the standard complete? What do we need? US-probe data, polydata colors, volume transfer functions /LUTs. ? File Formats: Models, Volumes, Video streams, US metadata, scenegraph. Some of these objects are already somewhat standardized, but not all. ? Algorithms: A library of IGT algorithms would be welcome. It might be included into an existing library (VTK, CTK, ?) or emerge as a new one. Best Regards ----------------------------------------------------- Christian Askeland Senior Software Engineer / Research Scientist, MSc. christian.askeland at sintef.no Phone: (+47) 41926862 SINTEF Medical Technology Location: Olav Kyrres gt. 9 http://www.sintef.no http://www.usigt.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andinet.enqu at kitware.com Sat Nov 28 07:51:33 2015 From: andinet.enqu at kitware.com (Andinet Enquobahrie) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 07:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Steve, Thanks for the heads up! It looks like a very interesting project. It is great to see our old friends from SINTEF joining in the effort. We will try to join in the Google hangout on December 7. Andras, For our tracking needs, we obviously use PLUS a lot and we will continue to do that in our IGT projects. For our surgical simulation projects, we use force feedback haptics devices such as Phantom Omni and we have been looking into VRPN https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki VRPN supports a large collection of haptic devices https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki/Supported%20hardware%20devices But, looking at the large list of devices PLUS continues to support https://www.assembla.com/spaces/plus/wiki I was wondering if force feedback haptics devices support is also in the roadmap. thanks, Andinet On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Steve Pieper wrote: > Hi CTKers - > > Just FYI about discussions we are having leading up to project week in > January. Anyone who's interested is welcome to join. > > -Steve > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Andras Lasso > Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:23 PM > Subject: RE: IGT software collaboration intro meeting > To: Christian Askeland , Simon Drouin < > drouin.simon at gmail.com>, Junichi Tokuda , Steve > Pieper , Tamas Ungi , Adam Rankin < > arankin at robarts.ca> > Cc: "Kapur, Tina,Ph.D." , "Norton, Isaiah" < > inorton at bwh.harvard.edu>, Alireza Mehrtash , > Prashin Unadkat , "tormod.selbekk at sintef.no" < > tormod.selbekk at sintef.no>, Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng < > Janne.Beate.Lervik.Bakeng at sintef.no>, Ingerid Reinertsen < > Ingerid.Reinertsen at sintef.no>, Thomas Lang? , > Frank Lindseth , "D. Louis Collins" < > louis.collins at mcgill.ca>, Gabor Fichtinger > > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for the very productive meeting today. I?ve uploaded the meeting > minutes to the NAMIC week?s project page (thanks to Christian for the > inputs): > > > > > http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2016_Winter_Project_Week:TrackedUltrasoundStandardization > > > > We plan to have one or two more similar meetings before the project week > to continue the discussion. > > > > For all those who plan to attend the project week: please request an > account at the NAMIC wiki ( > http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Special:RequestAccount). It?ll allow > you to register to the event, edit the project page, etc. > > > > Andras > > > > > > *From:* Andras Lasso > *Sent:* November 19, 2015 6:06 PM > *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < > drouin.simon at gmail.com>; 'Junichi Tokuda' ; Steve > Pieper ; Thomas Lang? ; Frank > Lindseth ; D. Louis Collins < > louis.collins at mcgill.ca>; Tamas Ungi ; Gabor Fichtinger < > fichting at queensu.ca> > *Subject:* IGT software collaboration intro meeting > > > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for the doodle poll responses. Based on those, *November 23, > Monday, 9am EST* (probably 3pm Norway time) is the most suitable. > > > > You should be able to join the meeting through the google hangout link on > this page: > > > https://plus.google.com/events/ceo6eum5ja3rhjgjed29eiu67b8?authkey=COHXmfavj620Fg > > > > This will be an informal meeting to get to know each other and define > priorities for the next couple of months, in preparation for the project > week in January. > > > > Andras > > > > *From:* Andras Lasso > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:04 PM > *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < > drouin.simon at gmail.com> > *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < > Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron > Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee > Whiteway ; D. Louis Collins < > louis.collins at mcgill.ca> > *Subject:* RE: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives > > > > Hi all, > > > > Christian, thanks for the great summary of topics, these would all serve > as good basis of collaboration and convergence in IGT software. > > > > We?ve recently had a discussion at Montreal Neurological Institute (Louis > D Collins? group: Simon Drouin, Ian Gerard, Marta Kersten, et al.), they > are also very interested in integrating/migrating their software to > 3DSlicer-SlicerIGT-Plus, share algorithms, etc, and they, too, will come to > the project week to Boston in January. > > > > I would suggest to have a teleconference to introduce ourselves to each > other and discuss what topics we should focus on first. Christian, Simon > (and everyone else interested in this Project week planning meeting), > please mark your availability in this doodle poll: > > http://doodle.com/poll/9u5vqbtr4qk6famg > > > > Thanks, > > Andras > > > > *From:* Christian Askeland [mailto:Christian.Askeland at sintef.no > ] > *Sent:* November 17, 2015 1:05 PM > *To:* Andras Lasso > *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < > Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron > Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee > Whiteway > *Subject:* Re: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives > > > > Hi Andras, Gabor, all, > > > > Your suggesion regarding EU Twinning Programme came at the perfect time > for me - I was just about to send you, Andras, an email regarding the > Winter Project Week in January. We have discussed a bit in an email thread > originating in the OpenIGTLink list some weeks ago, I?ll continue from > there. > > > > Our group will be present in Boston with 1-2 software people, so it would > be great to start the work there, and then continue in Heidelberg and > beyond. We would like to work in integration of CustusX+PLUS, and on IGT > standardization in general. I hope both of these topics are of interest to > you. In Boston we will focus the work on CustusX+PLUS, but we can also > discuss standardization (also including the Slicer people and others) and > then focus more on this in Heidelberg, as I imagine this topic will need > time to mature. > > > > Below is a quick first draft of my thoughts. Andras, please iterate and/or > suggest topics. > > > > > > *Proposal for cooperation projects PerkLab/PLUS group, SINTEF/CustusX > group, (+ others).* > > > *Enhance connection of CustusX client to PLUS server:* > Background: CustusX has used PLUS to connect to an Ultrasonix scanner with > an attached tracking device from Ascension (Sonix GPS), as part of the EU > RASimAs project. CustusX also has tracking support from the IGSTK toolkit, > and own direct support for a number of video/US devices. We would like to > add PLUS to this family, poosibly replacing some of our older components. > > Topics: > > ? Tracking of BrainLab devices. > > ? Connection to BK medical scanners. > > ? Enhance transfer of US probe metadata. Might include extending the > OpenIGTLink standard. > > ? Use of PLUS US reconstruction algorithms in CustusX as an alternative to > CX internal algorithms, and enable comparison of algorithms. > > > > *Standardization of IGT software.* > Background: > > ? Emails, major players converge towards IGTLink. Several groups are using > PLUS and/or Slicer, but also open-sourcing their own software and want to > be compatible with each other. > > ? Data should be usable by several systems in order to ease comparison in > e.g. studies. > > ? Our group need to communicate models and volumes with Slicer, and would > like to use PLUS. > > > There are several areas where standardization would be beneficial: > > ? messaging between applications. > > ? file formats. > > ? algorithms/shared libraries. > > It is important to build as much as possible on existing material and de > facto standards. > > Topics: > > ? Messaging: OpenIGTLink is the de facto standard for messaging. Is the > standard complete? What do we need? US-probe data, polydata colors, volume > transfer functions /LUTs. > > ? File Formats: Models, Volumes, Video streams, US metadata, scenegraph. > Some of these objects are already somewhat standardized, but not all. > > ? Algorithms: A library of IGT algorithms would be welcome. It might be > included into an existing library (VTK, CTK, ?) or emerge as a new one. > > > > > > Best Regards > > ----------------------------------------------------- > Christian Askeland > Senior Software Engineer / Research Scientist, MSc. > > christian.askeland at sintef.no > Phone: (+47) 41926862 > > > > SINTEF Medical Technology > > Location: Olav Kyrres gt. 9 > http://www.sintef.no > http://www.usigt.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Ctk-developers mailing list > Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers > > -- Andinet Enquobahrie, Ph.D., MBA Assistant Director of Medical Computing Kitware, Inc. http://www.kitware.com (919) 969-6990 x311 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasso at queensu.ca Sat Nov 28 10:33:28 2015 From: lasso at queensu.ca (Andras Lasso) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:33:28 +0000 Subject: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting In-Reply-To: References: , , Message-ID: We could also add a VRPN interface to Plus, which would allow clients to access all VRPN-supported devices through OpenIGTLink protocol. Andras ________________________________ From: Andras Lasso Sent: ?2015-?11-?28 09:04 To: Andinet Enquobahrie; Steve Pieper Cc: ctk-developers at commontk.org Subject: RE: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting OpenIGTLink is becoming widely used in robotics projects, with participation of various robotics companies and research groups, so support of device positioning and force feedback is already good and will further improve in OpenIGTLink. Junichi/BWH recently received NIH funding to work on this. The CISST library already can be used as an OpenIGTLink-PhantomOmni bridge, but support for the device could be certainly added to Plus, too. If you have a device and a developer that could add a new Device class to Plus, we would be happy to help. Andras ________________________________ From: Andinet Enquobahrie Sent: ?2015-?11-?28 07:52 To: Steve Pieper; Andras Lasso Cc: ctk-developers at commontk.org Subject: Re: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting Steve, Thanks for the heads up! It looks like a very interesting project. It is great to see our old friends from SINTEF joining in the effort. We will try to join in the Google hangout on December 7. Andras, For our tracking needs, we obviously use PLUS a lot and we will continue to do that in our IGT projects. For our surgical simulation projects, we use force feedback haptics devices such as Phantom Omni and we have been looking into VRPN https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki VRPN supports a large collection of haptic devices https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki/Supported%20hardware%20devices But, looking at the large list of devices PLUS continues to support https://www.assembla.com/spaces/plus/wiki I was wondering if force feedback haptics devices support is also in the roadmap. thanks, Andinet On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Steve Pieper > wrote: Hi CTKers - Just FYI about discussions we are having leading up to project week in January. Anyone who's interested is welcome to join. -Steve ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andras Lasso > Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:23 PM Subject: RE: IGT software collaboration intro meeting To: Christian Askeland >, Simon Drouin >, Junichi Tokuda >, Steve Pieper >, Tamas Ungi >, Adam Rankin > Cc: "Kapur, Tina,Ph.D." >, "Norton, Isaiah" >, Alireza Mehrtash >, Prashin Unadkat >, "tormod.selbekk at sintef.no" >, Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng >, Ingerid Reinertsen >, Thomas Lang? >, Frank Lindseth >, "D. Louis Collins" >, Gabor Fichtinger > Hi all, Thanks for the very productive meeting today. I?ve uploaded the meeting minutes to the NAMIC week?s project page (thanks to Christian for the inputs): http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2016_Winter_Project_Week:TrackedUltrasoundStandardization We plan to have one or two more similar meetings before the project week to continue the discussion. For all those who plan to attend the project week: please request an account at the NAMIC wiki (http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Special:RequestAccount). It?ll allow you to register to the event, edit the project page, etc. Andras From: Andras Lasso Sent: November 19, 2015 6:06 PM To: Christian Askeland >; Simon Drouin >; 'Junichi Tokuda' >; Steve Pieper >; Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; D. Louis Collins >; Tamas Ungi >; Gabor Fichtinger > Subject: IGT software collaboration intro meeting Hi all, Thanks for the doodle poll responses. Based on those, November 23, Monday, 9am EST (probably 3pm Norway time) is the most suitable. You should be able to join the meeting through the google hangout link on this page: https://plus.google.com/events/ceo6eum5ja3rhjgjed29eiu67b8?authkey=COHXmfavj620Fg This will be an informal meeting to get to know each other and define priorities for the next couple of months, in preparation for the project week in January. Andras From: Andras Lasso Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:04 PM To: Christian Askeland >; Simon Drouin > Cc: Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; Gabor Fichtinger >; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) >; Karilee Whiteway >; D. Louis Collins > Subject: RE: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi all, Christian, thanks for the great summary of topics, these would all serve as good basis of collaboration and convergence in IGT software. We?ve recently had a discussion at Montreal Neurological Institute (Louis D Collins? group: Simon Drouin, Ian Gerard, Marta Kersten, et al.), they are also very interested in integrating/migrating their software to 3DSlicer-SlicerIGT-Plus, share algorithms, etc, and they, too, will come to the project week to Boston in January. I would suggest to have a teleconference to introduce ourselves to each other and discuss what topics we should focus on first. Christian, Simon (and everyone else interested in this Project week planning meeting), please mark your availability in this doodle poll: http://doodle.com/poll/9u5vqbtr4qk6famg Thanks, Andras From: Christian Askeland [mailto:Christian.Askeland at sintef.no] Sent: November 17, 2015 1:05 PM To: Andras Lasso > Cc: Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; Gabor Fichtinger >; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) >; Karilee Whiteway > Subject: Re: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi Andras, Gabor, all, Your suggesion regarding EU Twinning Programme came at the perfect time for me - I was just about to send you, Andras, an email regarding the Winter Project Week in January. We have discussed a bit in an email thread originating in the OpenIGTLink list some weeks ago, I?ll continue from there. Our group will be present in Boston with 1-2 software people, so it would be great to start the work there, and then continue in Heidelberg and beyond. We would like to work in integration of CustusX+PLUS, and on IGT standardization in general. I hope both of these topics are of interest to you. In Boston we will focus the work on CustusX+PLUS, but we can also discuss standardization (also including the Slicer people and others) and then focus more on this in Heidelberg, as I imagine this topic will need time to mature. Below is a quick first draft of my thoughts. Andras, please iterate and/or suggest topics. Proposal for cooperation projects PerkLab/PLUS group, SINTEF/CustusX group, (+ others). Enhance connection of CustusX client to PLUS server: Background: CustusX has used PLUS to connect to an Ultrasonix scanner with an attached tracking device from Ascension (Sonix GPS), as part of the EU RASimAs project. CustusX also has tracking support from the IGSTK toolkit, and own direct support for a number of video/US devices. We would like to add PLUS to this family, poosibly replacing some of our older components. Topics: ? Tracking of BrainLab devices. ? Connection to BK medical scanners. ? Enhance transfer of US probe metadata. Might include extending the OpenIGTLink standard. ? Use of PLUS US reconstruction algorithms in CustusX as an alternative to CX internal algorithms, and enable comparison of algorithms. Standardization of IGT software. Background: ? Emails, major players converge towards IGTLink. Several groups are using PLUS and/or Slicer, but also open-sourcing their own software and want to be compatible with each other. ? Data should be usable by several systems in order to ease comparison in e.g. studies. ? Our group need to communicate models and volumes with Slicer, and would like to use PLUS. There are several areas where standardization would be beneficial: ? messaging between applications. ? file formats. ? algorithms/shared libraries. It is important to build as much as possible on existing material and de facto standards. Topics: ? Messaging: OpenIGTLink is the de facto standard for messaging. Is the standard complete? What do we need? US-probe data, polydata colors, volume transfer functions /LUTs. ? File Formats: Models, Volumes, Video streams, US metadata, scenegraph. Some of these objects are already somewhat standardized, but not all. ? Algorithms: A library of IGT algorithms would be welcome. It might be included into an existing library (VTK, CTK, ?) or emerge as a new one. Best Regards ----------------------------------------------------- Christian Askeland Senior Software Engineer / Research Scientist, MSc. christian.askeland at sintef.no Phone: (+47) 41926862 SINTEF Medical Technology Location: Olav Kyrres gt. 9 http://www.sintef.no http://www.usigt.org _______________________________________________ Ctk-developers mailing list Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers -- Andinet Enquobahrie, Ph.D., MBA Assistant Director of Medical Computing Kitware, Inc. http://www.kitware.com (919) 969-6990 x311 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andinet.enqu at kitware.com Sat Nov 28 10:37:56 2015 From: andinet.enqu at kitware.com (Andinet Enquobahrie) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We could also add a VRPN interface to Plus, which would allow clients to > access all VRPN-supported devices through OpenIGTLink protocol. > That would be awesome! > > Andras > ------------------------------ > From: Andras Lasso > Sent: ?2015-?11-?28 09:04 > To: Andinet Enquobahrie ; Steve Pieper > > Cc: ctk-developers at commontk.org > Subject: RE: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro > meeting > > OpenIGTLink is becoming widely used in robotics projects, with > participation of various robotics companies and research groups, so support > of device positioning and force feedback is already good and will further > improve in OpenIGTLink. Junichi/BWH recently received NIH funding to work > on this. > > The CISST library already can be used as an OpenIGTLink-PhantomOmni > bridge, but support for the device could be certainly added to Plus, too. > If you have a device and a developer that could add a new Device class to > Plus, we would be happy to help. > > Andras > ------------------------------ > From: Andinet Enquobahrie > Sent: ?2015-?11-?28 07:52 > To: Steve Pieper ; Andras Lasso > Cc: ctk-developers at commontk.org > Subject: Re: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro > meeting > > Steve, > > Thanks for the heads up! It looks like a very interesting project. It is > great to see our old friends from SINTEF joining in the effort. We will try > to join in the Google hangout on December 7. > > Andras, > > For our tracking needs, we obviously use PLUS a lot and we will continue > to do that in our IGT projects. > > For our surgical simulation projects, we use force feedback haptics > devices such as Phantom Omni and we have been looking into VRPN > > https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki > > VRPN supports a large collection of haptic devices > > https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki/Supported%20hardware%20devices > > But, looking at the large list of devices PLUS continues to support > > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/plus/wiki > > I was wondering if force feedback haptics devices support is also in the > roadmap. > > thanks, > Andinet > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Steve Pieper wrote: > >> Hi CTKers - >> >> Just FYI about discussions we are having leading up to project week in >> January. Anyone who's interested is welcome to join. >> >> -Steve >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Andras Lasso >> Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:23 PM >> Subject: RE: IGT software collaboration intro meeting >> To: Christian Askeland , Simon Drouin < >> drouin.simon at gmail.com>, Junichi Tokuda , Steve >> Pieper , Tamas Ungi , Adam Rankin < >> arankin at robarts.ca> >> Cc: "Kapur, Tina,Ph.D." , "Norton, Isaiah" < >> inorton at bwh.harvard.edu>, Alireza Mehrtash , >> Prashin Unadkat , "tormod.selbekk at sintef.no" < >> tormod.selbekk at sintef.no>, Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng < >> Janne.Beate.Lervik.Bakeng at sintef.no>, Ingerid Reinertsen < >> Ingerid.Reinertsen at sintef.no>, Thomas Lang? , >> Frank Lindseth , "D. Louis Collins" < >> louis.collins at mcgill.ca>, Gabor Fichtinger >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the very productive meeting today. I?ve uploaded the meeting >> minutes to the NAMIC week?s project page (thanks to Christian for the >> inputs): >> >> >> >> >> http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2016_Winter_Project_Week:TrackedUltrasoundStandardization >> >> >> >> We plan to have one or two more similar meetings before the project week >> to continue the discussion. >> >> >> >> For all those who plan to attend the project week: please request an >> account at the NAMIC wiki ( >> http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Special:RequestAccount). It?ll >> allow you to register to the event, edit the project page, etc. >> >> >> >> Andras >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Andras Lasso >> *Sent:* November 19, 2015 6:06 PM >> *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < >> drouin.simon at gmail.com>; 'Junichi Tokuda' ; >> Steve Pieper ; Thomas Lang? ; >> Frank Lindseth ; D. Louis Collins < >> louis.collins at mcgill.ca>; Tamas Ungi ; Gabor Fichtinger >> >> *Subject:* IGT software collaboration intro meeting >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Thanks for the doodle poll responses. Based on those, *November 23, >> Monday, 9am EST* (probably 3pm Norway time) is the most suitable. >> >> >> >> You should be able to join the meeting through the google hangout link on >> this page: >> >> >> https://plus.google.com/events/ceo6eum5ja3rhjgjed29eiu67b8?authkey=COHXmfavj620Fg >> >> >> >> This will be an informal meeting to get to know each other and define >> priorities for the next couple of months, in preparation for the project >> week in January. >> >> >> >> Andras >> >> >> >> *From:* Andras Lasso >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:04 PM >> *To:* Christian Askeland ; Simon Drouin < >> drouin.simon at gmail.com> >> *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < >> Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron >> Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee >> Whiteway ; D. Louis Collins < >> louis.collins at mcgill.ca> >> *Subject:* RE: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Christian, thanks for the great summary of topics, these would all serve >> as good basis of collaboration and convergence in IGT software. >> >> >> >> We?ve recently had a discussion at Montreal Neurological Institute (Louis >> D Collins? group: Simon Drouin, Ian Gerard, Marta Kersten, et al.), they >> are also very interested in integrating/migrating their software to >> 3DSlicer-SlicerIGT-Plus, share algorithms, etc, and they, too, will come to >> the project week to Boston in January. >> >> >> >> I would suggest to have a teleconference to introduce ourselves to each >> other and discuss what topics we should focus on first. Christian, Simon >> (and everyone else interested in this Project week planning meeting), >> please mark your availability in this doodle poll: >> >> http://doodle.com/poll/9u5vqbtr4qk6famg >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andras >> >> >> >> *From:* Christian Askeland [mailto:Christian.Askeland at sintef.no >> ] >> *Sent:* November 17, 2015 1:05 PM >> *To:* Andras Lasso >> *Cc:* Thomas Lang? ; Frank Lindseth < >> Frank.Lindseth at sintef.no>; Gabor Fichtinger ; Ron >> Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) ; Karilee >> Whiteway >> *Subject:* Re: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives >> >> >> >> Hi Andras, Gabor, all, >> >> >> >> Your suggesion regarding EU Twinning Programme came at the perfect time >> for me - I was just about to send you, Andras, an email regarding the >> Winter Project Week in January. We have discussed a bit in an email thread >> originating in the OpenIGTLink list some weeks ago, I?ll continue from >> there. >> >> >> >> Our group will be present in Boston with 1-2 software people, so it would >> be great to start the work there, and then continue in Heidelberg and >> beyond. We would like to work in integration of CustusX+PLUS, and on IGT >> standardization in general. I hope both of these topics are of interest to >> you. In Boston we will focus the work on CustusX+PLUS, but we can also >> discuss standardization (also including the Slicer people and others) and >> then focus more on this in Heidelberg, as I imagine this topic will need >> time to mature. >> >> >> >> Below is a quick first draft of my thoughts. Andras, please iterate >> and/or suggest topics. >> >> >> >> >> >> *Proposal for cooperation projects PerkLab/PLUS group, SINTEF/CustusX >> group, (+ others).* >> >> >> *Enhance connection of CustusX client to PLUS server:* >> Background: CustusX has used PLUS to connect to an Ultrasonix scanner >> with an attached tracking device from Ascension (Sonix GPS), as part of the >> EU RASimAs project. CustusX also has tracking support from the IGSTK >> toolkit, and own direct support for a number of video/US devices. We would >> like to add PLUS to this family, poosibly replacing some of our older >> components. >> >> Topics: >> >> ? Tracking of BrainLab devices. >> >> ? Connection to BK medical scanners. >> >> ? Enhance transfer of US probe metadata. Might include extending the >> OpenIGTLink standard. >> >> ? Use of PLUS US reconstruction algorithms in CustusX as an alternative >> to CX internal algorithms, and enable comparison of algorithms. >> >> >> >> *Standardization of IGT software.* >> Background: >> >> ? Emails, major players converge towards IGTLink. Several groups are >> using PLUS and/or Slicer, but also open-sourcing their own software and >> want to be compatible with each other. >> >> ? Data should be usable by several systems in order to ease comparison in >> e.g. studies. >> >> ? Our group need to communicate models and volumes with Slicer, and would >> like to use PLUS. >> >> >> There are several areas where standardization would be beneficial: >> >> ? messaging between applications. >> >> ? file formats. >> >> ? algorithms/shared libraries. >> >> It is important to build as much as possible on existing material and de >> facto standards. >> >> Topics: >> >> ? Messaging: OpenIGTLink is the de facto standard for messaging. Is the >> standard complete? What do we need? US-probe data, polydata colors, volume >> transfer functions /LUTs. >> >> ? File Formats: Models, Volumes, Video streams, US metadata, scenegraph. >> Some of these objects are already somewhat standardized, but not all. >> >> ? Algorithms: A library of IGT algorithms would be welcome. It might be >> included into an existing library (VTK, CTK, ?) or emerge as a new one. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> Christian Askeland >> Senior Software Engineer / Research Scientist, MSc. >> >> christian.askeland at sintef.no >> Phone: (+47) 41926862 >> >> >> >> SINTEF Medical Technology >> >> Location: Olav Kyrres gt. 9 >> http://www.sintef.no >> http://www.usigt.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ctk-developers mailing list >> Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers >> >> > > > -- > Andinet Enquobahrie, Ph.D., MBA > Assistant Director of Medical Computing > Kitware, Inc. > > http://www.kitware.com > (919) 969-6990 x311 > -- Andinet Enquobahrie, Ph.D., MBA Assistant Director of Medical Computing Kitware, Inc. http://www.kitware.com (919) 969-6990 x311 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasso at queensu.ca Sat Nov 28 09:04:58 2015 From: lasso at queensu.ca (Andras Lasso) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:04:58 +0000 Subject: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: OpenIGTLink is becoming widely used in robotics projects, with participation of various robotics companies and research groups, so support of device positioning and force feedback is already good and will further improve in OpenIGTLink. Junichi/BWH recently received NIH funding to work on this. The CISST library already can be used as an OpenIGTLink-PhantomOmni bridge, but support for the device could be certainly added to Plus, too. If you have a device and a developer that could add a new Device class to Plus, we would be happy to help. Andras ________________________________ From: Andinet Enquobahrie Sent: ?2015-?11-?28 07:52 To: Steve Pieper; Andras Lasso Cc: ctk-developers at commontk.org Subject: Re: [Ctk-developers] Fwd: IGT software collaboration intro meeting Steve, Thanks for the heads up! It looks like a very interesting project. It is great to see our old friends from SINTEF joining in the effort. We will try to join in the Google hangout on December 7. Andras, For our tracking needs, we obviously use PLUS a lot and we will continue to do that in our IGT projects. For our surgical simulation projects, we use force feedback haptics devices such as Phantom Omni and we have been looking into VRPN https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki VRPN supports a large collection of haptic devices https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/wiki/Supported%20hardware%20devices But, looking at the large list of devices PLUS continues to support https://www.assembla.com/spaces/plus/wiki I was wondering if force feedback haptics devices support is also in the roadmap. thanks, Andinet On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Steve Pieper > wrote: Hi CTKers - Just FYI about discussions we are having leading up to project week in January. Anyone who's interested is welcome to join. -Steve ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andras Lasso > Date: Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:23 PM Subject: RE: IGT software collaboration intro meeting To: Christian Askeland >, Simon Drouin >, Junichi Tokuda >, Steve Pieper >, Tamas Ungi >, Adam Rankin > Cc: "Kapur, Tina,Ph.D." >, "Norton, Isaiah" >, Alireza Mehrtash >, Prashin Unadkat >, "tormod.selbekk at sintef.no" >, Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng >, Ingerid Reinertsen >, Thomas Lang? >, Frank Lindseth >, "D. Louis Collins" >, Gabor Fichtinger > Hi all, Thanks for the very productive meeting today. I?ve uploaded the meeting minutes to the NAMIC week?s project page (thanks to Christian for the inputs): http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2016_Winter_Project_Week:TrackedUltrasoundStandardization We plan to have one or two more similar meetings before the project week to continue the discussion. For all those who plan to attend the project week: please request an account at the NAMIC wiki (http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Special:RequestAccount). It?ll allow you to register to the event, edit the project page, etc. Andras From: Andras Lasso Sent: November 19, 2015 6:06 PM To: Christian Askeland >; Simon Drouin >; 'Junichi Tokuda' >; Steve Pieper >; Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; D. Louis Collins >; Tamas Ungi >; Gabor Fichtinger > Subject: IGT software collaboration intro meeting Hi all, Thanks for the doodle poll responses. Based on those, November 23, Monday, 9am EST (probably 3pm Norway time) is the most suitable. You should be able to join the meeting through the google hangout link on this page: https://plus.google.com/events/ceo6eum5ja3rhjgjed29eiu67b8?authkey=COHXmfavj620Fg This will be an informal meeting to get to know each other and define priorities for the next couple of months, in preparation for the project week in January. Andras From: Andras Lasso Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:04 PM To: Christian Askeland >; Simon Drouin > Cc: Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; Gabor Fichtinger >; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) >; Karilee Whiteway >; D. Louis Collins > Subject: RE: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi all, Christian, thanks for the great summary of topics, these would all serve as good basis of collaboration and convergence in IGT software. We?ve recently had a discussion at Montreal Neurological Institute (Louis D Collins? group: Simon Drouin, Ian Gerard, Marta Kersten, et al.), they are also very interested in integrating/migrating their software to 3DSlicer-SlicerIGT-Plus, share algorithms, etc, and they, too, will come to the project week to Boston in January. I would suggest to have a teleconference to introduce ourselves to each other and discuss what topics we should focus on first. Christian, Simon (and everyone else interested in this Project week planning meeting), please mark your availability in this doodle poll: http://doodle.com/poll/9u5vqbtr4qk6famg Thanks, Andras From: Christian Askeland [mailto:Christian.Askeland at sintef.no] Sent: November 17, 2015 1:05 PM To: Andras Lasso > Cc: Thomas Lang? >; Frank Lindseth >; Gabor Fichtinger >; Ron Kikinis (kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu) >; Karilee Whiteway > Subject: Re: EU Twinning Programme /Objectives Hi Andras, Gabor, all, Your suggesion regarding EU Twinning Programme came at the perfect time for me - I was just about to send you, Andras, an email regarding the Winter Project Week in January. We have discussed a bit in an email thread originating in the OpenIGTLink list some weeks ago, I?ll continue from there. Our group will be present in Boston with 1-2 software people, so it would be great to start the work there, and then continue in Heidelberg and beyond. We would like to work in integration of CustusX+PLUS, and on IGT standardization in general. I hope both of these topics are of interest to you. In Boston we will focus the work on CustusX+PLUS, but we can also discuss standardization (also including the Slicer people and others) and then focus more on this in Heidelberg, as I imagine this topic will need time to mature. Below is a quick first draft of my thoughts. Andras, please iterate and/or suggest topics. Proposal for cooperation projects PerkLab/PLUS group, SINTEF/CustusX group, (+ others). Enhance connection of CustusX client to PLUS server: Background: CustusX has used PLUS to connect to an Ultrasonix scanner with an attached tracking device from Ascension (Sonix GPS), as part of the EU RASimAs project. CustusX also has tracking support from the IGSTK toolkit, and own direct support for a number of video/US devices. We would like to add PLUS to this family, poosibly replacing some of our older components. Topics: ? Tracking of BrainLab devices. ? Connection to BK medical scanners. ? Enhance transfer of US probe metadata. Might include extending the OpenIGTLink standard. ? Use of PLUS US reconstruction algorithms in CustusX as an alternative to CX internal algorithms, and enable comparison of algorithms. Standardization of IGT software. Background: ? Emails, major players converge towards IGTLink. Several groups are using PLUS and/or Slicer, but also open-sourcing their own software and want to be compatible with each other. ? Data should be usable by several systems in order to ease comparison in e.g. studies. ? Our group need to communicate models and volumes with Slicer, and would like to use PLUS. There are several areas where standardization would be beneficial: ? messaging between applications. ? file formats. ? algorithms/shared libraries. It is important to build as much as possible on existing material and de facto standards. Topics: ? Messaging: OpenIGTLink is the de facto standard for messaging. Is the standard complete? What do we need? US-probe data, polydata colors, volume transfer functions /LUTs. ? File Formats: Models, Volumes, Video streams, US metadata, scenegraph. Some of these objects are already somewhat standardized, but not all. ? Algorithms: A library of IGT algorithms would be welcome. It might be included into an existing library (VTK, CTK, ?) or emerge as a new one. Best Regards ----------------------------------------------------- Christian Askeland Senior Software Engineer / Research Scientist, MSc. christian.askeland at sintef.no Phone: (+47) 41926862 SINTEF Medical Technology Location: Olav Kyrres gt. 9 http://www.sintef.no http://www.usigt.org _______________________________________________ Ctk-developers mailing list Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers -- Andinet Enquobahrie, Ph.D., MBA Assistant Director of Medical Computing Kitware, Inc. http://www.kitware.com (919) 969-6990 x311 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: