[Ctk-developers] Extend CTK CLI XML schema for meshes and grids
Steve Pieper
pieper at isomics.com
Thu Jun 18 11:23:08 UTC 2015
+1
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Fetzer, Andreas <
a.fetzer at dkfz-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> For our case this would be very helpful. We need to distinguish these
> different types.
> If there are no objections, we would gladly contribute this.
>
>
> Am 16/06/15 23:11 schrieb "Andras Lasso" unter <lasso at queensu.ca>:
>
> >type="model" means vtkPolyData. Probably it's better not to overload this
> >meaning but instead define a new type for vtkUnstructuredGrid. Maybe
> >something like type="unstructured-model", type="unstructured",
> >type="unstructured-grid".
> >
> >Andras
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ctk-developers [mailto:ctk-developers-bounces at public.kitware.com]
> >On Behalf Of Fetzer, Andreas
> >Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:37 AM
> >To: ctk-developers at commontk.org
> >Subject: Re: [Ctk-developers] Extend CTK CLI XML schema for meshes and
> >grids
> >
> >Hi all!
> >
> >thank you for your feedback and sorry for my late response, I was on a
> >business trip last week.
> >We are using the image tag to create a image specific selection combobox
> >in MITK, so that only images can be selected as input parameters.
> >
> >Now some of our users want to have the same selection combobox for
> >vtkPolyData and vtkUnstructuredGrid. I will have to check whether the
> >geometry type is sufficient for that. I think if we could differentiate
> >between polydata and unstructuredGrid, it would be great and the "model"
> >type might be to generic for that.
> >
> >Thanks again!
> >
> >Andreas
> >
> >Von: Steve Pieper <pieper at isomics.com<mailto:pieper at isomics.com>>
> >Datum: Wednesday 3 June 2015 20:46
> >An: Matt Clarkson <m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>>
> >Cc: Andreas Fetzer
> ><a.fetzer at dkfz-heidelberg.de<mailto:a.fetzer at dkfz-heidelberg.de>>,
> >"ctk-developers at commontk.org<mailto:ctk-developers at commontk.org>"
> ><ctk-developers at commontk.org<mailto:ctk-developers at commontk.org>>
> >Betreff: Re: [Ctk-developers] Extend CTK CLI XML schema for meshes and
> >grids
> >
> >Hi -
> >
> >In our (slicer) terminology Model is basically a vtkPolyData for the
> >purposes of a CLI. A fiber bundle is a specialized type of Model that
> >includes tensors at the vertices of polylines.
> >
> >-Steve
> >
> >On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Clarkson, Matt
> ><m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
> >Hi Andreas,
> >
> >Sounds good to me in principal. However, I have to admit to not knowing
> >all the history.
> >I also can see that there is a geometryType, which has enumeration of
> >fibrebundle and model.
> >Both of these could I imagine (but don't know for sure) be represented by
> >vtkPolyData.
> >So, are meshes and grids similar?
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >
> >On 3 Jun 2015, at 09:04, Fetzer, Andreas
> ><a.fetzer at Dkfz-Heidelberg.de<mailto:a.fetzer at Dkfz-Heidelberg.de>> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> We are using the CTK CLI module a lot for exchanging and connecting
> >>functionalities between different projects.
> >> Now, some of our users raised the requirement to also specify meshes
> >>and grids within a cli.
> >>
> >> Since the CTK cli xml schema
> >> (https://github.com/commontk/CTK/blob/master/Libs/CommandLineModules/C
> >> ore/Resources/ctkCmdLineModule.xsd)
> >> currently only defines images we would have to extend the schema.
> >>
> >> That is why I wanted to ask, if you see any obstacles regarding the
> >> enhancement of the schema for meshes and grids, or if there was a
> >>specific reason, why only images are currently defined by the xml schema.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andreas
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ctk-developers mailing list
> >> Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com<mailto:Ctk-developers at public.kitware
> >> .com> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ctk-developers mailing list
> >Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com<mailto:
> Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com
> >>
> >http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ctk-developers mailing list
> >Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com
> >http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20150618/71651bc7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ctk-developers
mailing list