[Ctk-developers] [slicer-devel] DICOM Module

Marco Nolden m.nolden at dkfz-heidelberg.de
Mon Feb 24 11:16:02 EST 2014


On 02/21/2014 04:16 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Your contribution are very welcome.
>
> Let's also note that version of DCMTK used in CTK is 2yrs old ( See [1][2] )
>
> We could consider upgrading but we should also note that the version in
> debian stable is still 3.6.0 [3]
>
> @Marco: What do you think ?

The version that is linked in the superbuild is already newer than 3,6.0 
so we could of course update this to a newer snapshot. IIRC we just 
agreed that it should be possible to build CTK using an official DCMTK 
release, possibly with some missing functionality in that case.

However, there is currently no dartclient checking this configuration so 
I'm not sure if it still works ...

Best,
Marco



>
> Jc
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/commontk/CTK/blob/4cfeaaf79e54dba8ed73fab1d15fad36bffd209d/CMakeExternals/DCMTK.cmake#L27
>
> [2] https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/ae3b946f6e6231
>
> [3] https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=dcmtk
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Aaron Boxer <boxerab at gmail.com
> <mailto:boxerab at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, Steve. I will pick up the discussion with the CTK folks.
>     I really like the modularization/OSGI features of CTK, but I see a
>     lot of room for improvement on the UX side.
>     By day, I work on an in-house Clear Canvas based RIS/PACS system for
>     a large hospital network, and I see all the
>     time how little UI improvements make big differences for the users.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Aaron
>
>
>     On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Steve Pieper <pieper at isomics.com
>     <mailto:pieper at isomics.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Aaron -
>
>         I suggest we move this discussion over to the ctk-developers
>         mailing list (you might want to sign up [1] if you haven't
>         already) since as you saw that level of the code is housed in
>         CTK and there's active work going on among that group.  I've
>         cc'd ctk-developers here to get the ball rolling.
>
>         Regarding the shared/static libraries issue with DCMTK it would
>         be great to file that as an issue on the ctk issue tracker [2].
>           Probably the configuration of the ctkDICOM2 executable isn't
>         getting the right flags.
>
>         As for the user interface options you are right - there's a lot
>         that can be done to simplify/streamline the interface.  There's
>         been quite some research and discussion on that [3] and your
>         contributions would be most welcome.  Alireza at BWH and Andreas
>         at DKFZ have been taking the lead on this and we're aiming for
>         an architecture that allows the flexibility to support various
>         use cases as seen in Slicer and MITK.
>
>         By the way, as a reminder to people with an interest in this
>         topic, please sign up on the wiki page if you plan to attend the
>         May CTK hackfest [4] either in person or electronically.
>
>         Best,
>         Steve
>
>         [1]
>         http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
>         [2] https://github.com/commontk/CTK/issues
>
>         [3]
>         http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2014_Project_Week:Slicer_DICOM_Module_Interface_Redesign
>
>         [4] http://www.commontk.org/index.php/CTK-Hackfest-May-2014
>
>
>         On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Aaron Boxer <boxerab at gmail.com
>         <mailto:boxerab at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             Thanks, Steve. I did manage to build CTK under VS 2010.
>
>             It seems that the Cmake script caused DCMTK to build as
>             static libaries, but when I tried to run ctkDICOM2, it was
>             looking
>             for ofstd.dll, for example. So, these dlls were not in the
>             CTK build. Once I put the Slicer DCMTK binary
>             folder on the path, ctkDICOM2 ran ok. But the CMake script
>             may need to be fixed.
>
>             My ideas on changing the interface run along the lines of
>             the ClearCanvas workstation:
>
>             See the first screenshot on the left here
>
>             http://sourceforge.net/projects/clearcanvas/
>
>             for more details.
>
>             Having all search controls and search results on one page
>             makes the search experience quite pleasant.
>             Also, since a PACS workflow is study based, you only need to
>             have a single table of studies, rather than
>             the three in the current implementation: patient, study,
>             series.  The user can always search by patient id or name
>             if they want.
>
>             Once I get familiar with the code, I will see if I can come
>             up with a prototype for this.
>
>             Cheers,
>             Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>             On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Steve Pieper
>             <pieper at isomics.com <mailto:pieper at isomics.com>> wrote:
>
>                 Hi Aaron -
>
>                 Thanks for your offer of help - much appreciated!
>
>                 In terms of development, you can build the CTK code
>                 stand-alone and use the ctkDICOM2 application as a stand
>                 alone to do query/retrieve and play with the database
>                 display.  This is pretty quick since the testing app is
>                 small.
>
>                 On the slicer side, everything is just python code that
>                 uses the widgets from the ctk code.  Since slicer takes
>                 a while to start up, I typically use a little helper
>                 code to rebuild a copy of the DICOM module for testing.
>                   Slicer allows you to have a .slicerrc.py in your home
>                 directory that loads a script with customizations.  I
>                 have a .slicerrc.py file in github [1] that includes a
>                 reloader for the DICOM module [2].  So if you edit the
>                 python code and hit a keybinding [3] you get a new copy
>                 of the interface without exiting and re-starting slicer.
>                   This makes it pretty efficient to tweak & test the
>                 python code  quickly.
>
>                 -Steve
>
>                 [1] https://github.com/pieper/SlicerRC
>
>                 [2]
>                 https://github.com/pieper/SlicerRC/blob/master/slicerrc.py#L186-L212
>
>                 [3]
>                 https://github.com/pieper/SlicerRC/blob/master/slicerrc.py#L250
>
>
>                 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Aaron Boxer
>                 <boxerab at gmail.com <mailto:boxerab at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                     Thanks, Steve. I'm happy to fix bugs.
>
>                     What is your dev environment like?  Can you build
>                     the DICOM widget standalone, or do you need to run
>                     it from the Slicer project?
>
>
>
>
>                     On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Steve Pieper
>                     <pieper at isomics.com <mailto:pieper at isomics.com>> wrote:
>
>                         Hi Aaron -
>
>                         The code is split between the core functionality
>                         in ctk [1] and the slicer module's use of that
>                         code [2].  You could review and contribute to
>                         the issues [3].
>
>                         HTH,
>                         Steve
>
>
>                         [1]
>                         https://github.com/commontk/CTK/tree/master/Libs/DICOM
>
>
>                         [2]
>                         https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/tree/master/Modules/Scripted/DICOM
>
>                         [3]
>                         http://na-mic.org/Bug/search.php?project_id=3&category=Module+DICOM&sticky_issues=on&sortby=last_updated&dir=DESC&hide_status_id=90
>
>
>                         On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Aaron Boxer
>                         <boxerab at gmail.com <mailto:boxerab at gmail.com>>
>                         wrote:
>
>                             I have some ideas about improving the user
>                             expericne for the DICOM widget. What tools
>                             would I need to build and modify this ?
>
>                             Thanks very much,
>                             Aaron
>
>                             _______________________________________________
>                             slicer-devel mailing list
>                             slicer-devel at bwh.harvard.edu
>                             <mailto:slicer-devel at bwh.harvard.edu>
>                             http://massmail.spl.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/slicer-devel
>                             To unsubscribe: send email to
>                             slicer-devel-request at massmail.spl.harvard.edu <mailto:slicer-devel-request at massmail.spl.harvard.edu>
>                             with unsubscribe as the subject
>                             http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Documentation/Nightly/Developers/FAQ
>
>
>                             The information in this e-mail is intended
>                             only for the person to whom it is
>                             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was
>                             sent to you in error and the e-mail
>                             contains patient information, please contact
>                             the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
>                             http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If
>                             the e-mail was sent to you in error
>                             but does not contain patient information,
>                             please contact the sender and properly
>                             dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ctk-developers mailing list
>     Ctk-developers at commontk.org <mailto:Ctk-developers at commontk.org>
>     http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
>
>
>
> --
> +1 919 869 8849


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inform. Med. Marco Nolden
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum       (German Cancer Research Center)
Div. Medical & Biological Informatics          Tel: (+49) 6221-42 2325
Im Neuenheimer Feld 280                        Fax: (+49) 6221-42 2345
D-69120 Heidelberg                             eMail: M.Nolden at dkfz.de



More information about the Ctk-developers mailing list