[Ctk-developers] ctkSliderWidget, ctkDoubleSlider and ctkDoubleSpinBox invertedControls property

[Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin]

Hi Folks,

As this been resolved / finalised ?

Jc


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Miklos Espak <espakm at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Julien Finet <julien.finet at kitware.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Miklos Espak <espakm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Julien,
> >>
> >> I am afraid, I cannot do this in the close future.
> >>
> >> We are still stuck with an older revision of CTK and cannot upgrade
> >> because MITK cannot be built with the current CTK master. This is
> >> because of a DCMTK CMake issue that has been discussed by JC and Marco
> >> recently.
> >>
> >> So, I do not have a ctkSpinBox yet, and the upgrade would break our
> build.
> >
> > I believe you should be able to cherry-pick some commits though.
>
> We tried it with Sascha today, it conflicted. I would resolve it if I
> could benefit of the change, but currently, I cannot for the reasons
> mentioned before.
>
> I just mentioned that I cannot upgrade the CTK, that means I am *not
> able to test* those changes even if I could resolve the conflicts and
> build it, which in itself is just double work, with questionable
> result and no benefit for me.
>
> >>
> >> You said, the ctkSpinBox might lead to some issues. Does this mean
> >> that you are thinking of having a separate double and integer spin
> >> boxes?
> >
> > I'm not sure yet, but it's a possibility. I would like to have a good
> reason
> > to do it before doing so. For example, one (false) problem I was
> thinking of
> > was that the ctkSpinBox has signals and slots that take doubles and not
> > ints. And sometimes it's much easier when the signals/slots have the
> right
> > type. But we could add those signal/slots to ctkSpinBox, it's not a
> problem.
>
> In this case, it might be better to wait until the design is finalised.
>
> Cheers,
> Miklos
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>



-- 
+1 919 869 8849
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20130516/5954fa49/attachment.htm>