[Ctk-developers] Fwd: [mitk-users] MITK with Latest CTK - problem with DCMTK

Fri Apr 19 12:40:31 UTC 2013

Hi Matt,

I don't know which change or who did these changes. But if we can find out,
I could provide guidance so that we can add so configure check in order to
make the feature introspection of DCMTK robust. That way, we would be able
to include / exclude part of the CTKDCMTK library appropriately.

Thanks
Jc

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Clarkson, Matt <m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>wrote:

>  Hi there CTK-ers,
>
>  please can anyone help me out with a CTK / DCMTK problem?  It looks to
> me like recent changes to CTK stop CTK working with the official DCMTK
> snapshots which are used in MITK.
> Is that right?
>
>  If anyone can shed light on the way forward, Im happy to try and help
> here.
>
>  Thanks
>
>  Matt
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>  *From: *Marco Nolden <m.nolden at dkfz-heidelberg.de>
>  *Subject: **Re: [mitk-users] MITK with Latest CTK - problem with DCMTK*
>  *Date: *13 April 2013 22:38:37 BST
>  *To: *"Clarkson, Matt" <m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>
>  *Cc: *mitk-users <mitk-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> MITK's super build is using dcmtk-3.6.1_20120222, but there is a newer
> snapshot here [1] and from a quick look through the Changes we could
> upgrade if it compiles with MITK. If you like to try it you could replace
> the URL in CMakeExternals/DCMTK.cmake (and remove or adapt the URL_MD5
> line).
>
> I'm not sure though that the CTK change you mention will work with that
> snapshot. CTK by default uses a forked version of DCMTK and there has been
> some activity lately. IIRC we agreed that CTK _should_ always build with
> the official DCMTK snapshots as well, but I'm afraid that doesn't get
> tested regularly. So if that is broken we should contact JC if the changes
> can be made in a compatible way.
>
> If you could confirm that MITK builds with the newer snapshot we could
> upgrade this on our side. Unfortunately I can't test it myself at the
> moment.
>
> Upgrading the CTK version can be more tricky, Sascha could maybe comment
> on that. If you are just interested in the slider tick change, we could
> also use a special version, did that before.
>
> Best,
>
> Marco
>
> [1]:
> http://dicom.offis.de/download/dcmtk/snapshot/dcmtk-3.6.1_20121102.tar.gz
>
>
>
> Am 04.04.2013 21:06, schrieb Clarkson, Matt:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Following the merging of CTK issue #313 to CTK master (CTK commit
> 099a88bb24), I then tried to update my MITK to compile with this version of
> CTK, so I could pick up Miklos's new slider tick interval.
> However, in the CTK master branch, commit 52d9539f5e, which is 3 before
> the latest, causes CTK to not build using the DCMTK version that MITK is
> using.
>
> So, it looks to me like MITK will need to consider upgrading DCMTK before
> they can move to the latest CTK, which is the reason I post here, instead
> of the CTK mailing list.
>
> However, I don't really understand what the reason for the CTK change is,
> or why CTK has a different fork of DCMTK, or what exactly is the version of
> DCMTK that MITK is using - dcmtk-3.6.1_20120222.tar.gz, so Im a bit stuck.
>
> Can anyone in MITK-land shed a light on a way forward?
>
> Thanks
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
> Employer Resources Portal
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> mitk-users mailing list
> mitk-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
>

-- 
+1 919 869 8849
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20130419/09477a9d/attachment.htm>