[Ctk-developers] Problem in building ctk

[Julien Finet]

Hi Zhang,

I'm glad to hear that you manage to compile and use CTK. I would be curious
(probably off mailing list) to hear what you use CTK for.
Concerning your DLL issue, I just compiled CTK from scratch on Win7 x64
using VS 2008 (not x64), with just Core, Widgets, DICOM/Core and
DICOM/Widgets turned on, and it seems to link the dll with MSVCR90.DLL and
not MSVCR90D.DLL.

Can  you try a build from scratch? Are you sure you selected Release in the
build mode in Visual Studio (default is Debug).
How come you managed to use the dependency walker on 64b DLLs, it's not
supposed to work. What Qt were you using ? did you compile the binaries
yourself ?

Julien.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:38 PM, zhang xiaodong <zxdflyer at 163.com> wrote:

> Dear CTK hackers:
>     Recently I download the ctk source and compiled it with VS2008 X64 in
> Win7 X64 system. It works very well in my machine.
> Then I use some of the ctk dll,for example CTKDICOMCore.dll as the third
> party library that is refered by my application. It also
> works well in my machine. However when I deploy my application to the
> other computers which does not install VS2008, it just
> does not work. Judging from the error message, I think it may lose some dll
> files. So I use dependency walker to check if any dll
> is missing. But I am confused by the result. It shows the MSVCR90D.dll
> which is refered by CTKDICOMCore.dll is missing. But the
> CTKDICOMCore.dll is the release version.  I also checked the dll files in
> the CTKbuild releasedirectory and got the same result.
> Then I copied the manifest file and according dlls to the my applicaiton
> dirand it worked.
>
>   Why does it refer the debug version of MSVCR90D.dll ? Is there something
> wrong when I built CTK?  Anyone could help me?
> Thanks very much.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20110321/ded3e58e/attachment.htm>