[Ctk-developers] pythonqt questions
Steve Pieper
pieper at bwh.harvard.edu
Mon Mar 7 16:13:48 UTC 2011
Hi Mathieu -
Jc can comment more fully, but I think yes, we want the CTK code to be
licensed under apache2, but since PythonQt is LGPL we may need to apply
that to some patches, which I think would be okay.
Regarding the upstream integration we can't say - the package is pretty
much complete so it doesn't see much activity. We certainly make the
patches available and would be glad to see them in the main distribution.
Best,
steve
On 03/07/2011 10:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Dear CTK hackers,
>
> I am looking at:
>
> https://github.com/commontk/PythonQt
>
> Would it be possible for one of you guys to confirm what is the
> license uses by this patched PythonQt fork (in particular the
> cmakelists.txt files). I would think this is an apache 2.0 license
> (http://www.commontk.org/LICENSE).
>
> On a different subject is upstream going to integrate changes done
> for CTK (eg. src/PythonQtStdIn.*&
> generated_cpp/PythonQt_QtBindings.*) back to the official repository ?
>
> Thanks,
More information about the Ctk-developers
mailing list