[Ctk-developers] Coding conventions

[Steve Pieper]

Hi Paolo -

Excellent - thanks.

We can also look at the slicer guidelines to get ideas:

http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Slicer3:Style

Really the thing I feel strongly about is this statement:

 > All C++ classes must conform to the style conventions of their parent 
classes.

For pure CTK classes, I like the idea of promoting a 'best of the best' 
style guideline and the maf one looks good to me.

Do other projects (MITK, DTK, etc) have style guideline pages we could 
look at?

-Steve



On Apr/15/10 8:24 AM, Quadrani Paolo wrote:
> Dear CTK developers,
> as I saw that some code has been written and pushed to the Gti
> repository made available from Steve Pieper, I would suggest to you all
> to start thinking also at defining some *coding conventions*, so our
> code will looks homogeneous and nice and clear to read / understand.
>
> In *MAF3* we have *defined some simple rules* to follow and you can
> review them at this address: http://bit.ly/95k5rJ
> If you like, I can propose to adopt them or we can start from them and
> define the CTK coding conventions.
>
> According to those rules, we have already some python scripts that
> automatically checks that all of those rules are respected in source
> code written and committed in the repository.
>
> Attached you can find a couple of MAF3 classes (as example) that I wrote
> for the framework.
>
> Cheers
>
> Paolo Quadrani
> _________________________________
> BioComputing Competence Centre
> SCS s.r.l.
>
> Via Magnanelli 6/3, 40033
> Casalecchio di Reno
> Italy
> http://bit.ly/9pqADE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers