[ITK] [ITK-users] Can I alter the way SliceBySliceImageFilter defines the origin of the internal slices?
hellman
fredrik.hellman at gmail.com
Fri Sep 8 11:13:24 EDT 2017
I am not sure. In SliceBySliceImageFilter.hxx for ITK 4.12.0, on line 188, it
says:
// copy the requested region to the internal slice region in
// dimension order
unsigned int internal_i = 0;
for ( unsigned int i = 0; internal_i < InternalImageDimension; ++i,
++internal_i )
{
if ( i == this->m_Dimension )
{
++i;
}
internalOutputRegion.SetSize( internal_i, requestedSize[i] );
internalOutputRegion.SetIndex( internal_i, requestedIndex[i] );
internalInputRegion.SetSize( internal_i,
this->GetInput(0)->GetRequestedRegion().GetSize(i) );
internalInputRegion.SetIndex( internal_i,
this->GetInput(0)->GetRequestedRegion().GetIndex(i) );
}
This will copy all indices (except the slicing dimension) of input 0 to
internalInputRegion, which is set as the regions for the internal image
further down. In my case, the 5s get copied here.
I have also stopped in a debugger in ImageToImageFilter (of my
BinaryFunctorImageFilter) where the check that the physical regions overlap
is performed. At this point, both images have the same region index [5, 5],
but one image has origin (0, 0) and the sliced image has origin (1.5, 1.5).
--
Sent from: http://itk-users.7.n7.nabble.com/
_____________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
More information about the Community
mailing list