[ITK] [ITK-dev] Problems with Change in itkStaticConstMacro

[Bradly Lowekamp]

It’s certainly would be great if I could rely on using gcc 4.8+ for building the distributions for SimpleITK. But my understanding for several situations 4.1 is still essentially required.

So you saying you are dropping support for compilers SimpleITK needs for some distributions?

Your blog post solution for static linking in un-accetable as I don’t want to use a GPL license. Along with static linking not being recommended with PEP 513, and lastly it can cause conflicts when used in a loaded module with an older libc version.

PEP 513 clearly says:
GCC <= 4.2.0
I’ll have to explore the manylinux1 docker image more…
We know the macro in ITK which needs to be fixed. I don’t understand the resistance…
Brad

> On Jan 21, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> PEP 513 proposes using GCC 4.8.2 in a CentOS 5 Docker image.  This was
> discussed here:
> 
>  http://kitware.com/blog/home/post/986
> 
> Our planned compiler support does not explicitly mention GCC 4.1, but
> it says GCC 4.2 should be phased out this year:
> 
>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/Modern_C%2B%2B
> 
> Matt
> 
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>> Just to re-iterate the importance of maintain full support for GCC 4.1 with
>> the ability is instantiate ITK templates, here is the new Python PEP 513[1],
>> which suggests using CentOS with gcc 4.1
>> 
>> Also note my working around for disabling SimpleITK’s explicit template
>> instantiation, did not work [2] yet.
>> 
>> Brad
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/
>> [2] https://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=SimpleITK
>> 
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Luc,
>> 
>> Thanks for looking into this.
>> 
>> This bug is related to the older GCC 4.1 compiler that is found standard
>> with Redhat 5 and Fedora 5 and used for distributions such as Anaconda’s
>> Python. I apologize for the incorrect version before.
>> 
>> Here is some ITK code to reproduce the error:
>> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20674/
>> 
>> Thank you for exploring a minimal test case. Your code does compile and run
>> OK with GCC 4.1.
>> 
>> As a work around for SimpleITK I have disabled the SimpleITK Explicit
>> library for now [1], this is not an optimal solution, and we should try to
>> get explicit instantiation working again with GCC 4.1
>> 
>> Brad
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITK/compare/next#diff-af3b638bc2a3e6c650974192a53c7291
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:39 AM, Luc Hermitte <luc.hermitte at c-s.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Le 20/01/2016 09:57, Luc Hermitte a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Le 19/01/2016 21:19, Bradley Lowekamp a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> My release builds for SimpleITK are having significant problems with the
>> change done here [1] to the itkStaticConstMacro.
>> 
>> My builds on Redhat 5, with gcc 5.1, are filling my disk with errors
>> along the following:
>> [...]
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> 
>> I’ll look into alternatives...
>> 
>> 
>> Can you isolate the error on a simple test case that reproduce the issue?
>> 
>> 
>> I've tried the file attached on https://ideone.com/SGlJ1i but it seems
>> valid with GCC 5.1.
>> 
>> However, in C++11, constexpr is required. And my g++ 4.8.2, and clang++
>> as well, tell me:
>> 
>> || g++ -std=c++03 -Werror -Wall -pedantic    extern-templ.cpp   -o
>> extern-templ
>> extern-templ.cpp|19 col 24| error: ISO C++ 1998 forbids the use of
>> 'extern' on explicit instantiations [-Werror=pedantic]
>> ||  extern template struct Bar<Foo<int>, Foo<double> >;
>> 
>> 
>> What differs in SimpleITK source code?
>> 
>> 
>> --Luc
>> <extern-templ.cpp>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> 
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> 
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20160121/b4d1b565/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers