[ITK] reading private tags returns weird strings
Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu
Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu
Wed Aug 10 10:41:00 EDT 2016
Le 10/08/2016 à 16:23, Dženan Zukić a écrit :
Does Matlab have special support for those private tags? They may have special encoding besides base64 applied by ITK DICOM dictionary.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:13 AM, <Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu<mailto:Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu>> wrote:
Le 10/08/2016 à 16:05, Dženan Zukić a écrit :
In fact, this decodes<http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/base64decode/> to 00 80 93 43 - four bytes given here in hexadecimal notation. The decoder you linked does not seem to work correctly. I don't know why you expect 295 there.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:58 AM, <Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu<mailto:Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu>> wrote:
Le 10/08/2016 à 14:35, Dženan Zukić a écrit :
Hi Francois,
is this base64 encoded? You should perhaps do base64 decode on the return string to get the binary value.
Regards,
Dženan
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:15 AM, <Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu<mailto:Francois.GIRINON at ensam.eu>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to read private dicom tags using :
ImageIOType::Pointer dicomIO = ImageIOType::New();
...
dicomIO->SetLoadPrivateTags(true);
std::string offsetFromBottomStr;
std::string offsetFromBottom = "0863|1041";
dicomIO->GetValueFromTag(offsetFromBottom, offsetFromBottomStr);
The value offsetFromBottomStr returned is AICTQw==
How does it come and how can I fix this ?
Thank you,
François.
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
Community at itk.org<mailto:Community at itk.org>
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
Thanks for your answer. You might be right, they say here<http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/2016-May/011426.html> private tags and encodes the with Base64 into strings.
Unfortunately, AICTQw== should correspond to 295 and according to https://www.base64decode.org/, AICTQw== is a C.
Besides, I don't understand how does itksysBase64_Decode works (I'm not sure I should use this method too).
In fact I have previously red the dicom using matlab and the value of the private tag 0863 1041 is 295.
I don't know, it doesn't seem really matlab specific, this tool<https://github.com/gerddie/ginkgocadx> also gets a dicom inspector module which displays 295.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20160810/41324a9c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Community
mailing list