[ITK] [ITK-users] itk::Command dtor non-virtual on purpose?

[Vaaksiainen]

Retyping the header: is the itk::Command destructor non-virtual on purpose?

http://www.itk.org/Doxygen48/html/itkCommand_8h_source.html

64 protected:
65  Command();
66  ~Command();

The way I used its derivatives, don't see any reason for such.


Best regards,
-Vaaksiainen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20150904/3aeaacdd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_____________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users