[ITK] [ITK-users] Region of two labelObjects

Fri Apr 17 08:24:20 EDT 2015

Yes sorry I had to pospone it because of an stressful deadline I have, but
hopefully next week, two tops.

2015-04-17 12:09 GMT+02:00 Arnaud Gelas <arnaudgelas at gmail.com>:

> Hi Pol,
>
> I am extremely interested in this change!!!
> Do you have any idea when you think you could submit a patch for it?
>
> thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Pol Monsó Purtí <lluna.nova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Matt,
>>
>> I've set the Git and Gerrit access. I believe everything's ok. I'll get
>> to it next Tuesday.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Pol
>>
>> 2015-04-02 15:22 GMT+02:00 Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Pol,
>>>
>>> Thanks for considering make improvements to this code.  Instructions
>>> to submit a patch can be found here [1].  Please let us know if you
>>> have any questions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://insightsoftwareconsortium.github.io/ITKBarCamp-doc/CommunitySoftwareProcess/SubmitAPatchToGerrit/index.html
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Pol Monsó Purtí <lluna.nova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello Gaëtan,
>>> >
>>> > Yes I agree, Thinking about it later I also reached the same
>>> conclusion that
>>> > a filter that changes the regions internally without warning could be a
>>> > pitfall.
>>> >
>>> > The RegionFromReferenceLabelMapFilter might actually work for me given
>>> that
>>> > I do have the original ROI region and roi image, but I can implement
>>> the
>>> > ComputeBoundingBox() function anyway, it's cleaner if I don't use the
>>> > original ROI.
>>> >
>>> > What's the workflow for submitting code? Fork the itk repository, add
>>> the
>>> > method and PR or something else?
>>> >
>>> > If you'd rather have a filter that does this, I unfortunatelly won't
>>> have
>>> > the time to do it this month (and maybe next)...
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > Pol
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2015-04-02 14:32 GMT+02:00 Gaetan Lehmann <gaetan.lehmann at gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Pol,
>>> >>
>>> >> 2015-03-30 23:02 GMT+02:00 Pol Monsó Purtí <lluna.nova at gmail.com>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hello all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have two label objects, how can I merge the two BoundingBoxes
>>> together
>>> >>> so I know the necessary size of the image? (other than creating it
>>> myself by
>>> >>> searching max/min of each dimension)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> How come LabelMap doesn't resize automatically when objects are
>>> added? It
>>> >>> could.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> The LabelMap class was designed to work as much as possible as the
>>> Image
>>> >> class, that does not have this kind of behavior, and to avoid as much
>>> as
>>> >> possible the costly operations.
>>> >>
>>> >> So while I don't think this should be done automatically, we should
>>> have
>>> >> some methods or filters to make this easy to do.
>>> >>
>>> >> There are a few filters to manipulate the regions of a LabelMap, but
>>> none
>>> >> of them does exactly what you need:
>>> >>
>>> >> * PadLabelMapFilter that can enlarge the LabelMap region, but not
>>> based on
>>> >> its content
>>> >> * CropLabelMapFilter that can shrink the LabelMap region, but not
>>> based on
>>> >> its content
>>> >> * RegionFromReferenceLabelMapFilter that makes the LabelMap region
>>> match
>>> >> the region of a reference input image
>>> >> * AutoCropLabelMapFilter that reduce the region covered by a label map
>>> >> based on its content, but can't enlarge it
>>> >>
>>> >> In my opinion, we should have a ComputeBoundingBox() method in
>>> LabelMap
>>> >> that compute the region covered by all the label objects - the code
>>> can be
>>> >> moved from AutoCropLabelMapFilter. We could then do
>>> >>
>>> >>   labelMap->AddLabelObject(labelObject1);
>>> >>   labelMap->AddLabelObject(labelObject2);
>>> >>   labelMap->SetRegions(labelMap->ComputeBoundingBox());
>>> >>
>>> >> to update the region.
>>> >>
>>> >> Would you agree to implement such a method for the LabelMap class?
>>> >>
>>> >> Optionally, we could also think to a filter to do that in a pipeline.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Gaëtan
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _____________________________________
>>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>>> >
>>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>> >
>>> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>> > http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>>> >
>>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>> >
>>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/community/attachments/20150417/5ab05893/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_____________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users